Search for: "United States v. Brooks" Results 341 - 360 of 938
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2017, 1:16 pm
Specifically, Plaintiff alleges that he was arrested, incarcerated, and criminally prosecuted for engaging in constitutionally protected free speech and was detained and arrested without probable cause in violation of the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:32 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Unless It's All Politics, China And The United States Should Tone It Down - Washington DC attorney Dr. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 10:06 am by John Elwood
Certiorari stage documents: Opinion below (Ohio Supreme Court) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Amicus brief of the Center for Democracy & Technology Petitioner’s reply Title: Brooks v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 3:55 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Concepcion - Hartford, CT lawyer Wystan Ackerman of Robinson & Cole on the firm's Insurance Class Actions Insider WWJD--United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 8:33 am by Steve Vladeck
” The oral argument itself revealed a number of Justices both sympathetic to that claim and skeptical of Maryland’s response, even as they appeared to agree with Maryland and the United States (appearing as an amicus in support of the state) that the PLRA does not brook the “special circumstances” exception on which the court of appeals relied. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 10:52 am by Anna Christensen
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Title: United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 2:08 pm by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Brook said the ACLU already has at least one case before United States District Court Judge William Osteen in federal district court for the Middle District of North Carolina. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  If one compares the United States Constitution with the fifty state constitutions, let alone most modern foreign constitutions, it is easily the least democratic constitution in the mix. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 12:35 pm by Schachtman
The Senate Committee report highlights the hypocrisy of some critics of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in, Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 4:41 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Given the nature of the Brady violation with respect to the known but undisclosed prior bad act, i.e., the courier information, in the context of this trial the undisclosed information is not material, not only because the information was vague, but also because it is so similar to the disclosures already provided: the information withheld is merely cumulative of equally impeaching evidence introduced at trial as held in United States v Spinelli. [read post]