Search for: "United States v. Certain Accounts" Results 341 - 360 of 4,790
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2022, 7:56 am by OTy9gYz
By Nina Rice* The history of New York’s statutory law pertaining to the art market is relatively brief despite the state’s long held status as the art capital of the United States, if not the world. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 7:14 am by Louis Pechman
For a United States Department of Labor Fact Sheet on “Tipped Employees Under the Fair Labor Standards Act,” click U.S. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 4:54 am by Jim Singer
Recent publications indicate that intangible assets account for between 70 percent and 80 percent of the overall value of United States companies. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 5:20 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The rule of law, as observed in Roncarelli v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am by Blog  Editorial
  In relation to control, no material difference as regards the position of the state. 15.07: Thomas de la Mare QC takes the Court through the cases of Barnado and Mallin v Clark. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 11:28 am by Charles Davis
It also limited how state and local political parties used contributions in certain circumstances that could have an impact on a federal election, such as certain get-out-the-vote or issue-advocacy campaigns. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:52 pm by Priscilla Smith
Whichever account the Circuit embraces, its rational-basis claims flout both Casey and Carhart). [2] 550 U.S. 124 (2007) [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 11:40 am by Rich McHugh
By Rich McHugh The United State Supreme Court issued an opinion on June 12, 2014 in Clark v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 6:57 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
Nat’l Australia Bank, the United States Supreme Court held that U.S. securities laws do not apply extraterritorially. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 2:12 am by Florian Mueller
Qualcomm, there's also a short but interesting ruling that United States Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:39 am
  As it also explains, most state courts in the United States are courts of “general” jurisdiction, which means they can hear “any case over which no other tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
However, under the current subject matter jurisprudence for patents in the United States, there is not a strong incentive for the development of diagnostic methods or treatment methods wherein a certain population goes untreated. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 6:00 am
Dec. 22, 2009), the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit applied the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Tellabs, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 7:13 am
Chase claimed that section 452(c) of the Evidence Code, which allows judicial notice of "official acts of the legislative, executive, and judicial departments of the United States and of any state of the United States" applied. [read post]