Search for: "United States v. Clinton" Results 341 - 360 of 1,477
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2019, 12:28 pm by Christopher Fonzone
More recently, the Clinton administration's Sandy Vershbow and Nelson Drew help to create the path leading to the Dayton Accords; Meghan O’Sullivan advocates for the Iraq surge in the George W. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 2:10 pm by Tom Smith
Every Democrat in the Senate is backing a constitutional amendment that aims to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 7:08 am by William Treanor
At the time of the impeachment proceedings involving Clinton, the standard view among academics, although not the House of Representatives, was that Clinton’s conduct was not an “offense against the United States” because it did not involve his actions as president. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 1:39 pm by Florian Mueller
But even if it weren't, the key findings in the Qualcomm case regarding component-level licensing and the smallest salable patent-practicing unit (SSPPU), and the conclusions Judge Koh had previously reached in GPNE Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:26 am by Steve Lubet
President Nixon was forced to turn over the Watergate tapes to the special prosecutor (U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 6:00 am by Quinta Jurecic
The Constitution states that members of Congress—along with every state legislative official and every judicial and executive official of both the state and federal governments—“shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 5:41 am by Jessica Zhang, Andrew Patterson
Overview The federal statute criminalizing illegal entry into the United States, 8 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 4:09 pm by John Floyd
  President Fails to Appreciate Independent Judiciary   In a prepared statement presented to the law-abiding citizens of the United States, Chief Justice Roberts scolded the president like the spoiled child he daily resembles with this rebuke:   “We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 10:18 am by Paul Clement
Take, for example, Justice Stevens’ solo dissent in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm by Jareb Gleckel and Sherry F. Colb
From outer space, when people see the United States, they would see Trump Wall. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:54 am by Andrei Gribakov
Importantly, Chapter V of the GDPR authorizes only three methods for legal data transfers from the EEA to a third country, such as the United States: adequacy decisions, appropriate safeguards or limited enumerated exceptions (“derogations”). [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 1:05 pm by Vishnu Kannan, Margaret Taylor
  Judge Tatel indicates his view that this case is closer to Clinton v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 7:22 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
 The man I'm talking about is the president of the United States, and the social media platform is Twitter. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
United States—flew under the radar perhaps because it was decided narrowly; the Court upheld the discretion enjoyed by the U.S. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 2:18 pm by Jonathan Shaub
(The first was by President Clinton.) [read post]