Search for: "United States v. One Case of Clocks"
Results 341 - 360
of 582
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
A typical light-duty case is Reeves v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am
This afternoon at one o’clock the Court will hear oral arguments in Schuette v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:34 pm
See Kinetic Concepts, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 11:00 am
Circuit turned to this question, in the case of Hentif v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 9:58 am
The case is a direct outgrowth of the Court’s 2003 decisions in Gratz v. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 11:00 am
But jurisdictional objections are another matter, as the United States explains in its opposition brief: 1. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 10:04 am
In so holding, the Ninth Circuit was simply recognizing that the United States Supreme Court’s decision earlier this year in Standard Fire Insurance v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 12:33 pm
Back in 1968, the United States Supreme Court issued their opinion in the case of Terry v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 7:03 am
“It’s nice to know that you focus and work to meet our unit goal of 90 percent daily. [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 1:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am
This appeal arises from an inter partes reexamination proceeding before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO). [read post]
28 May 2013, 11:20 am
The new case denied Tuesday was United Airlines v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:00 am
The justices had one such example before them at that very moment: the case of Jose Padilla. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 7:34 am
United States, 505 U.S. 647 (1992), the defendant was unable to point to specific facts illustrating that the delay harmed his ability to defend himself adequately. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
As it is often the case, the improvement made to serve one may ends up serving all others. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 1:10 am
Widely unnoticed by the public, a fight between Apple and Samsung in two venues -- the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the United States District Court for the Northern District of California -- over the proper way forward for their first U.S. federal litigation is ecalating. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
” Many have come down forcefully on one side or the other on the idea. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 12:30 pm
United States. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 4:10 am
In one significant decision [L'Oreal v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:58 am
United States, No. 12-622C (2013) involved a solicitation to provide laboratory testing services to the VA in the great state of Kansas, as well as in Missouri and Illinois. [read post]
