Search for: "United States v. Plate" Results 341 - 360 of 892
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2015, 9:48 pm by Mark Summerfield
The short answer is ‘somewhat’, but to nowhere near the extent it would be in some other jurisdictions, and in particular the United States. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 11:33 am
United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914), the case that is generally understood as having introduced the exclusionary rule. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 7:32 am by John Elwood
The Supreme Court didn’t have a conference last week, so it has more on its plate for this Friday’s conference than usual: 278 cases are scheduled for review. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 12:28 pm by Richard S. Zackin
United States, the United States Supreme Court resolved a disagreement among the lower federal courts over the scope of the CFAA’s “exceeds authorized access” clause. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 12:28 pm by Richard S. Zackin
United States, the United States Supreme Court resolved a disagreement among the lower federal courts over the scope of the CFAA’s “exceeds authorized access” clause. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 12:28 pm by Richard S. Zackin
United States, the United States Supreme Court resolved a disagreement among the lower federal courts over the scope of the CFAA’s “exceeds authorized access” clause. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 6:06 am
Additionally, the Supreme Court of the United States recently noted, `[m]odern cell phones are not just another technological convenience. [read post]
1 May 2007, 12:25 pm
International and United States law prohibits the discharge of waste containing more than 15 parts per million oil without treatment by an oil water separator and oil sensing equipment. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 10:25 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) Here’s an interesting Fourth Amendment question decided by the 8th Circuit last year in United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 9:46 am by Tara Hofbauer
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Wells noted the opening of a week-long hearing in the military commission case, United States v. [read post]