Search for: "United States v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon"
Results 341 - 360
of 790
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2018, 3:39 am
Richardson, 411 U.S. 677 (1973), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case which decided that benefits given by the United States military to the family of service members cannot be given out differently because of sex.Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg stated at oral argument:"Mr. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 3:07 am
The court stated that claim construction implies construing the use of drafting techniques (Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:23 pm
The court’s ruling in City of Grants Pass v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 3:04 pm
” The major new case was the ground-breaking decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:30 pm
The order simply states that, "The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in these cases expressing the views of the United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 5:23 am
And it is certainly possible that the decision will be reviewed by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 9:16 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 7:29 pm
The Service revised its critical habitat designation for the units after this Court vacated the Service's original designation in 2001. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
When Oregon District Court Judge Anna Brown held that the right to international flight was a protected liberty interest, it was a pretty big deal. [read post]
31 May 2014, 6:58 am
Kennedy has asked for replies by Monday afternoon from Oregon state officials and from the same-sex couples who won that case in a federal district court. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 1:42 pm
Supreme Court ruling in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 7:24 pm
United States made it to the Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 7:03 am
A federal district court in California has certified several Rule 23 classes and conditionally certified an FLSA collective action in a wage suit filed by call center employees who alleged their insurance company employer failed to pay them for pre-shift time they had to spend ramping up for duty (Ribot v Farmers Insurance Group, July 18, 2013, Pregerson, D). [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 11:05 am
Nix, State v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 10:33 am
The Supreme Court granted review to decide whether this violates the free exercise clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 7:34 am
The two amicus briefs were filed by 17 attorneys general, including New York, Virginia, Maryland, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and the District of Columbia. [read post]
29 May 2019, 8:45 am
United States, the Supreme Court made clear that the third-party doctrine does not automatically apply to sensitive agglomerations of digital-age records. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:35 pm
Penguin sued American Buddha in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, claiming that American Buddha uploaded unauthorized copies of four of Penguin’s books and, in doing so, violated Penguin’s copyrights. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:31 pm
Penguin sued American Buddha in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, claiming that American Buddha uploaded unauthorized copies of four of Penguin’s books and, in doing so, violated Penguin’s copyrights. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 1:07 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeEvidence Showed Defendant Knew Cathinone A Controlled Substance, Conspiracy to Distribute United States, appellee v. [read post]
