Search for: "WILLIAMS v. SESSIONS" Results 341 - 360 of 784
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
John's University School of LawKatherine Schostok, DePaul University College of LawAllison Winnike, University of Houston Law Center 5:00 – 7:00 PM Welcome Reception – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law Friday, June 9, 20177:30 – 8:15 AM Registration & Breakfast – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law 8:15 – 8:30 AM Opening Remarks – Ceremonial Courtroom, Georgia State LawWendy Hensel, Interim Dean and Professor of Law, Georgia State University College of… [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 2:52 pm by Ilya Somin
He also explains that if the administration withholds the full range of grants potentially covered by the order and referenced in statements by administration officials, such withholding would be “coercive” under NFIB v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 10:14 am by David Kimball-Stanley
While early English courts were only in session a few months a year, they nonetheless heard habeas petitions out of session, meaning that “between 1500 and 1800, about one-fifth of the writs the judges of England issued” were heard without public access. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 6:00 am by Shea Denning
The attorney for the petitioner in the first case, County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 3:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Session 2: Proxies for Distinctiveness; Proving Distinctiveness (and Secondary meaning); Strength of a MarkDo current doctrinal tests properly assess actual consumer reaction to purported marks? [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 2:56 am
Ratner Paul Williams & Laura Livingston, reviewing Lawfare: Law as a Weapon of War, by Orde F. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At his eponymous blog, William Goren looks at last week’s decision in Fry v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 3:16 pm by Edith Roberts
She noted that the “Notorious RBG” meme took hold following her 2013 dissent in Shelby County v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 9:00 pm by Dean Falvy
The Tenure in Office Act was repealed in 1887, and in the case of Myers v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 6:15 pm by Amy Howe
Pryor reportedly had the support of Senator Jeff Sessions, Trump’s nominee to serve as the U.S. attorney general, but a possible Pryor nomination could have drawn the ire of both the left and the right: Although Pryor has referred to the Supreme Court’s 1973 decision in Roe v. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 11:45 am
Judge Pryor, more than any other potential Trump nominee, triggers strong opposition from liberal interest groups — civil rights groups, LGBT groups, and especially pro-abortion groups, who loathe his comments about Roe v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am by Tejinder Singh
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and then Chief Justice William Rehnquist on the Supreme Court. [read post]