Search for: "Warner v. United States" Results 341 - 360 of 573
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Dec 2011, 11:54 am by admin
Steel Investment Canada Case On November 24, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada denied leave in United States Steel Corporation et al. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 7:04 am by Frank O'Donnell, Clean Air Watch
“It's hard to know how this is going to play out until we see more units permitted and different types of units and how the guidance gets applied or not applied by state authorities and EPA to an individual set of circumstances,” said Steve Kohl, a partner at Warner, Norcross & Judd LLP who represented the Wolverine Power Supply Cooperative for two permit applications in Michigan.However, reducing emissions through efficiency has been the main… [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
However, we appreciate the fact that radio broadcasting is stillin a chaotic and experimental state and that, while ultimately it will have to be placed on a commercial basis if it is to develop its potentialities, nevertheless the commercial side of the broadcasting problem has not yet been solved. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:55 am by Marie Louise
(IP Osgoode) Patent Pilot Program (Docket Report) Design Patents (Inventive Step)   US Patents – Decisions BPAI: Marine Polymer and Section 112 rejections in reexamination: Nissim v Time Warner (WHDA) ITC issues notice of final determination finding s 337 violation in Certain Ink Cartridges With Printheads (337-TA-723) (ITC 337 Law Blog) District Court Arizona: Judge Campbell denies prosecution bar in reexamination: NeXedge v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 2:26 am by Marie Louise
(Ars Technica) Blockbuster trying to evade Warner Bros’ 28-day “buyers only” window (Ars Technica) Free FreeBieber.org! [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 3:17 am by Marie Louise
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law)   United States US Patents A trio of post-Bilski cases fail to clearly define the meaning of ‘abstract’ (Electronic Frontier Foundation) Google calls on Big Blue again; SEC filing reveals speed of Motorola patent due diligence (IAM)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Computer programs and patentable subject matter: Ultramercial, LLC v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 1:46 am by Marie Louise
Rogers Communications Inc (Michael Geist)   Czech Republic Pirate Party launches ‘Facebook’ for movies (TorrentFreak)   Germany Apple wins (again) in Germany: Galaxy Tab 10.1 injunction upheld (FOSS Patents) (FOSS Patents) (Class 99) Samsung’s German lawyer agrees with Apple on the purpose of patent enforcement (FOSS Patents) Cologne Regional Court rules ISP not responsible when subscribers infringe copyrights in dispute between EMI and ISP HanseNet Telekommunikations… [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 1:36 am by Marie Louise
– Mr Mabbett’s complaint against BBC (IPKat)   United States US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Flowchart insufficient structure to define software means-plus-function limitation: In re Aoyama (Patently-O) (IPBiz) (Maier & Maier) (Patents4Software) 10th Circuit Court of Appeals: SCO loses appeal in dispute with Novell over copyright claims to code used in Linux operating system (KEI) District Court C D California: When is a claim finally dead in patent… [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 8:15 am by admin
When the cellular phone emerged as a consumer product in the 1980s, it operated in 800 MHz frequencies, for which the FCC initially gave away two licenses for 40 MHz of spectrum in each of the 306 market areas in the United States – one to a wireless provider and one to a wired provider. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 7:22 am by Glenn
The world of communications has been dominated for three decades, since United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:13 am
As stated by General Counsel for Pernod Ricard Ian FitzSimons following the Third Circuit's decision, "We are determined to continue to fight for fair competition in the United States market where ownership of the ‘Havana Club' trademar [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 9:28 pm
The Declaratory Judgment Act provides that, "In a case of actual controversy within its jurisdiction . . . any court of the United States . . . may declare the rights and other legal relations of any interested party seeking such declaration, whether or not further relief is or could be sought. [read post]