Search for: "Washington v. Brooks"
Results 341 - 360
of 537
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm
Sanford, Plessy v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 1) (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Australian Bureau of Statistics going CC, under attribution-only licence (Creative Commons) (Michael Geist) Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers changes to opposition practice (International Law Office) Parody defence not available according to BC Supreme Court:… [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 3:08 pm
Stony Brook University). [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:48 pm
Supreme Court decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 12:34 pm
Pence Calls Out Chinese Intellectual Property Theft In a major speech on U.S. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 1:34 pm
Brookings’ William McCants points out that, if confirmed, the attack could prompt serious backlash by Russian forces against the Islamic State. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
: Industries Ltd v Dynamic Supply Pty Ltd: (IP Down Under)BrazilIFPI raids hundreds of internet cafes: 600 cops, one arrest: (Ars Technica)CanadaInterlocutory injunctions in trade mark cases: a difficult test to meet: CMAC Mortgages v Canadian Mortgage Expert Centre and CanadaHyundai Autov Cross Canada Auto Body Supply: (Canadian Trademark Blog), (coverage of Hyundia - IPblog), Privacy Coalition warns on copyright reform: (Michael Geist),Wikinomics on… [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 6:51 am
Brooks, 911 F. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 6:51 am
Brooks, 911 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
(ITC 337 Law Blog) What every transactional counsel should know – consequences of missing provisions in M&A documents: Carotek v Kobayashi Ventures; Gerber Scientific International v Satisloh (Property intangible) Troll Tracker suit settles after malice bar raised: Albritton v Cisco(Patent Baristas) (IPEG)(EDTexweblog.com) (The Prior Art) (IAM) US Patents – Decisions CAFC construes term found in specification but not in the claims:… [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm
To learn more about Brookings research programs, click here. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Nail v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
It may be hiding in plain sight in US patent database (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Interview with Mike Drummond of Inventors Digest (IP Watchdog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Impact of merger/buyout on prior agreement to not challenge patent validity: Epistar v ITC (Patently-O) (ITC 337 Law Blog) CAFC affirms in part, reverses in part, vacates in part and remands Linear Technology Corporation v ITC (ITC 337 Law Blog) CAFC: Genetech & Volkswagon… [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 4:46 pm
" Fox v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:55 pm
For example, in U.S. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:55 pm
For example, in U.S. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Kenkel, Cornell Brooks School of Public Policy; Lisa A. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 11:26 am
Thanks to Kevin Brooks for wading through the largest docket of the term to identify these cases. [read post]
11 May 2022, 8:51 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California rejected a joint proposal by attorneys seeking to represent the class, because all 11 of the attorneys put forward to serve were male.[5] Last year, in 2021, the Complex Litigation Center at George Washington University Law School updated a prior report aimed at improving practices to increase diversity among counsel representing class members.[6] And academics in the last few years have criticized the process by which class counsel is… [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
(Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement U [read post]
