Search for: "Waters v. Superior Court"
Results 341 - 360
of 890
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2021, 8:47 am
State v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:42 am
The Court of Appeal in Sandoz v BMS attempts to reconcile the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) decision in G 2/21, and the landmark UK Supreme Court decision on plausibility Warner-Lambert v Actavis [2018] UKSC 56. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 10:12 pm
Erickson, 522 U.S.262, 266 (1998); Memphis Light, Gas & Water Div. v.Craft, 436 U.S. 1, 13 (1978); Mathews v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 9:37 am
Does 1-40 (S.D.N.Y. 2004), adopted by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Arista Recs., LLC v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 6:20 pm
Title 8, section 1735) The trial court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment under Privette v. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 6:19 am
See Blair v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
Which court hears the removal case and under what procedures? [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 10:47 am
Superior Court); and mitigation requirements (City of San Diego v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 10:49 am
Superior Court of Los Angeles. [read post]
8 May 2015, 6:00 am
Barbour-Amir v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 4:50 am
Forcellati v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
Superior Court); and mitigation requirements (City of San Diego v. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 8:59 pm
The superior court affirmed both decisions. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 10:37 am
Supreme Court's 2012 decision in Miller v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 3:00 am
Hood v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 6:42 am
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania vacated the Superior Court’s ruling and remanded the case back to the Superior Court for reconsideration.[11] Perhaps most importantly, the Supreme Court rejected the Superior Court’s suggestion that the rule of capture does not apply to hydraulic fracturing due to the fact that hydraulic fracturing is an artificial means to stimulate production. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 9:23 am
Superior Court, 450 U.S. 464 (1981) Commentary: Margo Kaplan Judgment: Cynthia Godsoe Chapter 15. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 10:26 am
In recent years, the California Supreme Court has watered down Proposition 64's standing requirements. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 11:02 pm
In Arno v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 4:40 pm
The court held that under the standard of review the trial court was supposed to apply, the city council would be presumed to have a superior opportunity to know and consider the varied and conflicting interests involved in this matter, to balance the burdens and benefits, and to consider the general welfare of the area involved. [read post]
