Search for: "Wells v. CIR"
Results 341 - 360
of 14,466
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2010, 8:14 am
Pressure Products Medical Supplies, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 12:37 pm
See, e.g., McGuire v. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 7:45 am
In Madden v. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 10:38 am
Cir. 2013) (citing SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 10:47 am
But he still gets an order that requires that the DOJ hire him as well as over a quarter million bucks. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 1:41 am
There are a lot of freakishly bright people out there who might well be willing to put in the time to help identify the correct answer to these queries.If I taught evidence, and was really mean, I might make this an assignment to my class. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 7:39 pm
Yes, it may well be unreasonable for the police to wait only five seconds or so after knocking before starting to bash your door in. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 8:10 am
Barnes, 948 F.2d 325, 330 (7th Cir.1991); United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2006, 11:20 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 10:20 am
Cir. 2019) (citing Graham v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 4:44 pm
But as to the first point, Judge Rymer -- as well as Judge Betty Fletcher's concurrence -- persuaded me that plaintiff probably didn't have standing. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 5:00 am
LEXIS 12692 (9th Cir. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:33 pm
(quoting Blackie v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 10:23 am
Jones v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 9:38 am
” Sample v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 2:33 pm
of the opinion:"A variation on this view culminated in Brandenburg v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 10:56 am
University of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:52 pm
The day this opinion came out in September 2010, I wrote: "Given the significance of the case, as well as the lineup of the panel, I think you'll see this one taken en banc. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 11:05 am
Judge Tallman finds -- in a quite well-written opinion -- that there's a qualitative difference between (1) forthrightly admitting to the police that you have cocaine in a closed container, which suffices to waive your Fourth Amendment privacy expectations, and (2) using secret code words in a jailhouse telephone call that you know is monitored in the hope that your confederate can dispose of some evidence, which does not.But Judge Tallman then concludes the opinion by hinting to the… [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:50 pm
Cir. 2023)Malvern Panalytical Inc. v. [read post]
