Search for: "Wife B v. Husband B" Results 341 - 360 of 1,238
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2015, 11:18 am by Stephen Bilkis
The plaintiff wife and the criminal defendant husband were married in January 1972. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
The December 24, 2014 decision of the First Department in Anonymous v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 7:00 am by Megen Miller
In Richards, the trial court specifically found that the husband did not comply with the court's orders and that the violations “certainly caused confusion and extra time by all parties involved,” but because of the spousal support and property award denied attorney's fees to the wife. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 7:28 pm
However, once in a while I have seen situations where property rights are claimed in a property which is titled in neither the husband’s or wife’s name. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:58 am by James Bickford
  The “[b]ottom line,” he concludes, is that we should not expect either Justice to recuse. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 8:07 am by Grant
§ 78B-12-203 (7)(b) for imputation factors. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Giraldo v Fernandez, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 5226159, 2021 N.Y. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 6:24 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
Memo. 2019106, 2019 WL 3946102 (2019) (a) Facts: Husband and wife were divorced. [read post]
27 May 2020, 6:53 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
App’x 339 (3d Cir. 2018) (a) Facts: A husband and wife owned rental properties. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 8:07 am by Liisa Speaker
   In Hayley v Martin (Docket No. 324689), the plaintiff ex-wife filed a motion to modify the custody and parenting-time order, which the trial court granted in part. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 8:05 am by Michelle O'Neil
  Read the opinions here: IN THE INTEREST OF DAA-B A CHILD Pavan v Smith Treto v Treto   [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 8:05 am by Michelle O'Neil
  Read the opinions here: IN THE INTEREST OF DAA-B A CHILD Pavan v Smith Treto v Treto   [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 5:26 am
App. 1970) (holding husband established domicile for purposes of obtaining divorce in that jurisdiction, despite immigration status); Weber v. [read post]