Search for: "Beare v. State"
Results 3581 - 3600
of 15,024
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2014, 10:14 am
Thus, in R (Elias) v Secretary of State for Defence [2006] 1 WLR 3213 para 165 provides that in discrimination cases there should be a structured approach to the question of justification: “First, is the objective sufficiently important to justify limiting a fundamental right? [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 5:26 am
That end result does not appear to have happened here.For a copy of the Appellate Division's decision Horwitz v 1025 Fifth Ave., Inc., please click on the following link:[www.nycourts.gov] ===============*Under New York State law, Real Property Law section 234, when a residential lease provides that a landlord may recover its fees and costs incurred during the course of a lawsuit, a tenant will also entitled to seek such reimbursement -- should it prevail on its… [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm
” As I explained in an earlier post, Congress intended RFRA to incorporate by reference the Supreme Court’s Free Exercise Clause jurisprudence from the era preceding Employment Division v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 10:49 pm
State, 652 So. 2d 344, 346 (Fla. 1995); Lightbourne v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 7:30 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:36 am
In Barbee v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 12:23 am
§265.01 Unconstitutional Rejected; Defendant Does Not Have Right to Bear Arms in NY
People v. [read post]
2 Apr 2022, 8:48 am
Moreover, choice-of-law provisions in commercial contracts are also expressly authorized by Section 671.105(1), Florida Statutes., which provides: “[W]hen a transaction bears a reasonable relation to this state and also to another state or nation, the parties may agree that the law either of this state or of such other state or nation shall govern their rights and duties. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 9:54 am
In Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 8:34 am
Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 1:27 am
Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 7:45 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 1:55 pm
Div. 2008) (quoting State v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
On Monday, in Ramos v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:21 am
Now bear with me even further as we go down this rabbit hole. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:09 am
State v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 7:04 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 12:39 am
Haryana State Electricity Board v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 3:53 am
Last year in District of Columbia v. [read post]
