Search for: "California v. Texas" Results 3581 - 3600 of 4,448
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2010, 10:40 pm by Kelly
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp (Docket Report) District Court C D California: Advertising-based content distribution patent fails Bilski test: Ultramercial, LLC v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 9:19 pm by ireneolszewski
Applause is in order here … Schwarzenegger continues to reject Prop 8 appeal [Associated Press] Petition to Mandate California Governor File an Appeal in Perry v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 3:17 pm by Kent Scheidegger
That case is California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 5:13 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
Specifically, based on press coverage of the lawsuit, provider conduct here appears to have been both insensitive and secretive: The daughter was not just overruled but was overruled "without consultation"  [This is not allowed in Texas, Virginia, California, or any other U.S. state permitting unilateral refusal.] [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 1:09 am by John Steele
From Legal Malpractice Law Review: more on Black v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 1:17 am by Kelly
(Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court E D Texas: JMOL rulings – damages experts, future royalties, JMOL standards, obviousness, etc: Soverain v. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 2:02 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 86519 (SD CA, Aug. 23, 2010), a California federal district court dismissed an inmate's free exercise claim based merely on allegations that an unnamed Deputy Sheriff took a "religious cross artifact" from him.In Odneal v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm by Bexis
Feb. 3, 1992) (Thorotrast) (applying Texas law). [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 9:03 am by Anna Christensen
Opinion below (1st Circuit) Petition for certiorari Amicus brief of Texas et al. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm by Steven M. Taber
The settlement resolves Plains’ Clean Water Act violations for 10 crude oil spills in Texas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Kansas, and requires the company to pay a $3.25 million civil penalty. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Competition in Marketplace, infringer’s bankruptcy, and importance of patent to plaintiff’s business all favor imposition of permanent injunction: Clearvalue v Pearl River; Retractable Technologies v Occupational & Medical Innovations (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: As part of settlement agreement, false marking defendant gets a free pass on all future allegations of false marking: Patent Group,… [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he raises two sentencing issues. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 9:51 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In the years 2004 and 2005, IPBiz covered the Clyde Bryant v. [read post]