Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office" Results 3581 - 3600 of 13,840
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2017, 5:44 am by Patricia Salkin
Boomer v Waterman Family Limited Partnership, 2017 WL 823712 (MD 2/2/2017)  Filed under: Current Caselaw, Zoning Administration [read post]
24 May 2013, 12:51 pm by Kirk Jenkins
On the first argument day of the May term, the Justices of the Illinois Supreme Court actively questioned both sides in the first civil case on the docket, Relf v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
” The Hearing Officer, said the court, had engaged in a through analysis of the facts and circumstances, evaluated witnesses' credibility, and arrived at a reasoned conclusion. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 3:41 am
Unit exclusivityCSEA and Warrensburg CSD, 30 PERB 3056Suffolk Co Corrections Officers Assoc v PERB, App. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 2:38 pm by Unknown
Immunity inconsistency at the patent and trademark office: A case study for sovereign immunity in administrative adjudications. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 2:38 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Immunity inconsistency at the patent and trademark office: A case study for sovereign immunity in administrative adjudications. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 4:00 am
Appeal claims "procedural flaws" in conducting a disciplinary hearingMatter of Whyte v Horn, 38 A.D.3d 362Sharon Whyte was terminated from her employment as a correction officer after being found guilty of disciplinary charges that had been filed against her. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 3:22 am by Amy Howe
”   And in the ABA Journal, Erwin Chemerinsky cites the Court’s decisions in Zubik v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 4:52 am by Lyle Denniston
  In addition, the Administration urged the Circuit Court to vacate the ruling a year ago by U.S. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Conservatives—like the lawyers in the Trump administration who now argue that the ERA was not properly ratified—often decry creative constitutional interpretation by the courts. [read post]