Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 3581 - 3600
of 16,698
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2010, 6:52 am
State v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:22 am
Infringement - The de minimis principle in quia timet actionsThe de minimis principle has been considered in previous patent authorities (Hoechst v BP [1998], Monsanto v Cargill [2007], Napp v Ratiopharm [2009], Lundbeck v Norpharma [2011]). [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:48 am
Aug. 26, 2013), the United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit reaffirmed its prior decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 1:25 pm
Stated otherwise, the duty imposed upon a municipality when it undertakes to act in loco parentis is nondelegable (see Bartels v County of Westchester, 76 AD2d 517, 523). [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 2:15 pm
The case of Arnold Gross v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
The County then filed a petition pursuant to CPLR 7503 seeking to stay arbitration; CSEA cross-moved to compel arbitration.Supreme Court granted the County's application and denied CSEA's cross application. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
The County then filed a petition pursuant to CPLR 7503 seeking to stay arbitration; CSEA cross-moved to compel arbitration.Supreme Court granted the County's application and denied CSEA's cross application. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 5:23 pm
As stated by the Supreme Court of New Hampshire when interpreting a policy excluding water loss, "[t]o apply the ensuing loss provision to provide coverage for what is essentially a flood would subvert the intent of the parties" (Bates v Phenix Mut. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 5:15 pm
MICHAEL LEVANDOSKI V. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 8:34 am
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 2:03 pm
In contrast to CAAF's opinion in Forney, United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am
1538: Aidan O’Neill QC submits that the role of this court is to rebalance the constitution. 1530: Aidan O’Neill QC refers to the decision in Padfield v Minister of Agriculture at page 1061 of the decision. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 8:33 am
Cross Posted at the University of Chicago Law School Blog [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 10:30 am
HHJ Lewis noted the Court’s discretion to award a single award in the case or two or more libels, as stated in Lisle-Mainwaring v Associated Newspapers [2017] EWHC 543 (QB). [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 4:16 pm
Cross examination of Wayne Mallet continued after the lunch break. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 8:00 am
Collins v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 9:26 am
(Forbes Cross-Post) UMG Can’t Enforce “Not for Sale” Restrictions on Promo CDs — UMG v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:24 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 2:08 am
The BGH's decision could therefore affect litigation strategies in cross border trademark infringement scenarios. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 7:36 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court granted certiorari in United States v. [read post]
