Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 3581 - 3600 of 21,100
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2021, 2:10 pm by Mary Mock
The plaintiffs suing the apartment complex’s ownership and management allege that the shooting could have been prevented because the defendants were aware of the potential for violence and criminal acts on the property but failed to take reasonable steps to prevent the shooting. [read post]
12 May 2021, 2:10 pm by Mary Mock
The plaintiffs suing the apartment complex’s ownership and management allege that the shooting could have been prevented because the defendants were aware of the potential for violence and criminal acts on the property but failed to take reasonable steps to prevent the shooting. [read post]
12 May 2021, 9:15 am by Eric Goldman
The court says the lawsuit doesn’t seek to hold Snapchat liable as a publisher or speaker: Their negligent design lawsuit treats Snap as a products manufacturer, accusing it of negligently designing a product (Snapchat) with a defect (the interplay between Snapchat’s reward system and the Speed Filter). [read post]
12 May 2021, 8:32 am by Jonathan Bailey
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: Triller Hits H3 Podcast With $50m Jake Paul Piracy Lawsuit, Judge Guts Original Complaint First off today, Andy Maxwell at Torrentfreak writes that Triller’s lawsuit against various pirate sites has been gutted, leaving only one defendant, but the company has turned around and refiled at least one of those cases, targeting H3H3 Productions. [read post]
12 May 2021, 8:28 am by Anthony Carbone
Besides, the attorneys will use all this information to battle with the defendants attorneys to ensure you receive the maximum possible compensation. [read post]
12 May 2021, 5:57 am by John Jascob
In this case, the panel said, it was clear that the defendants became irrevocably liable to deliver shares in Boston, Massachusetts (SEC v. [read post]
12 May 2021, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
Therefore, [the defendant] cannot be found liable for infringement based on a common design. [read post]
11 May 2021, 6:53 am by Arielle E. Katz
On March 18, 2021, the ACLU joined the fight by filing an amicus brief in support of the defendant, arguing that the defendant cannot be held “liable under a discriminatory statutory scheme that punishes only disfavored speakers. [read post]
11 May 2021, 6:53 am by Arielle E. Katz
On March 18, 2021, the ACLU joined the fight by filing an amicus brief in support of the defendant, arguing that the defendant cannot be held “liable under a discriminatory statutory scheme that punishes only disfavored speakers. [read post]
11 May 2021, 6:53 am by Arielle E. Katz
On March 18, 2021, the ACLU joined the fight by filing an amicus brief in support of the defendant, arguing that the defendant cannot be held “liable under a discriminatory statutory scheme that punishes only disfavored speakers. [read post]
10 May 2021, 8:25 am by Anthony Carbone
If you or a loved one sustains a personal injury because of someone else’s negligent actions or carelessness, you may be eligible to hold them liable for any damages incurred as a result of the accident. [read post]
9 May 2021, 8:09 am by Throneberry Law Group
With the court’s ruling, defendant retailer Lot Less will remain as a defendant to the case while the plaintiff proceeds with the information gathering phase of the litigation in order to establish exactly what the business knew about the safety of the products it sold to consumers like the victim in this case. [read post]
8 May 2021, 3:46 pm by Mark Hartsoe
If one person owes a duty of care to another and a breach of that duty is the proximate cause of harm, the responsible individual (or business) is liable for the other’s damages. [read post]
8 May 2021, 6:45 am by Foran & Foran, P.A.
In a negligence action in Maryland, the plaintiff bears the burden of proving that the defendant was under a duty to protect the plaintiff from injury, that the defendant breached that duty, and that the plaintiff suffered actual injury or loss as a proximate result of the defendants breach of that duty. [read post]
8 May 2021, 4:27 am
Plaintiff claimed that, since AMC was RLJE’s controlling stockholder and RLJE directors were interested parties, Plaintiff had successfully rebutted the business judgment rule and shifted the burden of proof to the Defendant directors to show that the deal was a product of both fair dealing and fair price. [read post]
6 May 2021, 2:09 pm by Gregory Bean
That’s because the community association would already have to incur legal fees in defending itself in the lawsuit, and there would likely be only a modest additional scope of tasks relating to defending the pool manager as well. [read post]