Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 3581 - 3600
of 4,048
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
Hogan (invalidating same-sex admissions policy), considered her vote in United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 11:51 pm
This is less of a problem now though after the Spencer v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 1:18 pm
E.S.P. and Leaseco Group, LLC, v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 10:49 pm
” So observed Lord Clarke recently, in delivering the unanimous judgment of the United Kingdom Supreme Court in RTS Flexible Systems [“RTS”] v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 1:15 pm
Minister of National Revenue, [1975] 2 S.C.R. 248 at 254: Lord Guest in Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 12:58 pm
Johnson and U.S. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 11:51 pm
This is less of a problem now though, after the Spencer v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:41 am
” “In support of this argument, IMTC cited two foreign (and therefore non-binding) cases in which no conflict of interest was found to exist: Jones v AMP Perpetual Trustee Company NZ Ltd (1994) (New Zealand) and HSBC (HK) Ltd v Secretary of State for Justice (2001) (Hong Kong). [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 10:00 pm
We think this view leads to a state of uncertainty and gives primacy to the rule of EU law over the national constitutional rule of law. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 8:54 am
It was only in 1996, in the celebrated case Common Cause v. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 4:40 pm
In Lister v Hesley Hall, the House of Lords formulated a wider test, holding that the principal is liable for a tortious act when that is fair and just on the basis of the “close connection” between the act and the employment. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 2:00 pm
alp v. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 7:26 am
In a recent United Kingdom Supreme Court case in FS Cairo (Nile Plaza) LLC v Lady Brownlie, Lord Leggatt (with whom the other members of the Court all agreed) at paragraph 148 held that: “[T]he old notion that foreign legal materials can only ever be brought before the court as part of the evidence of an expert witness is outdated. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:52 am
Internet and Social Media The House of Lords Communications Committee continued its inquiry into internet regulation. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 2:37 am
More significantly, the qualified privilege set out in Part 2 currently only applies to publications arising in UK and EU member states. [read post]
10 May 2017, 8:01 am
Reed (1971), her majority opinion in the VMI gender discrimination case, United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm
Legislation providing for partial implemention of section 40 has already won the support of the House of Lords after Baroness Hollins put through an amendment to the investigatory powers bill, which would bring about cost protection for the victims of phone hacking. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 9:42 am
The result of this confusion is that LGBT's see themselves as "victims", and people like V. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:42 pm
Brown v. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 4:37 pm
On the same day Steyn J heard various applications in the case of Ameyaw v Goldrick. [read post]
