Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 3581 - 3600
of 20,071
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
T 228/89 [4.2] referring to T 5/81 [3]).[6.4] From these reasons it follows that the Board of Appeal has not decided “infra petita” and that the condition set out in R 104(b) is not met. [read post]
28 May 2018, 1:18 pm
Sheriff’s Dep’t v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
It doesn’t matter how small or large that loss of chance is. [read post]
28 May 2018, 1:18 pm
Sheriff’s Dep’t v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 2:57 pm
P. 54(b). [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 4:53 am
The IPKat thanks RGC Jenkins & Co, which represented Nestlé in this matter, for alerting the IPKat to this development. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 12:07 pm
by: Edward B. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 10:54 am
Are you reconsidering your position on the matter? [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 5:47 am
There is nothing new going on in the 21st century that didn't happen in the 20th century as to "patent assertion. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 6:54 pm
Two months later...]On 1 August 2014 the chief family advocate and designated representative of the applicant in terms of s 276(1)(a) of the Children’s Act 8 of 2005 appointed a family advocate, Mr Makhanya in terms of the Mediation and Certain Divorce Matters Act 24 of 1987 to deal with the matters arising from these proceedings. [ Another 6 weeks rolled by...]The applicant launched this application as late as 15 September 2014 and [ and then didn't seek… [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
There’s nothing wrong with B and C clients. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 8:17 am
Calibrating remedies to bargaining/penalizing those who reject early bargains—opposed to that as a policy matter. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 6:32 am
See Insurance Law § 3105 (b). [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 8:35 pm
Why does it matter whether a tax opinion is a reliance opinion? [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 6:55 am
If that Rule isn't uppermost in your mind, it says that: When a lawyer has terminated an association with a firm, the firm is not prohibited from thereafter representing a person with interests materially adverse to those of a client represented by the formerly associated lawyer and not currently represented by the firm, unless: (1) the matter is the same or substantially related to that in which the formerly associated lawyer represented the… [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 7:17 pm
Const, art VI, § 13 [b] [7]). [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am
Brian Salter, CPA, and Phillip B. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 1:49 am
(B) We can't require students emerging from law school to know everything. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 2:43 pm
First, Alito says that “procedural arguments” won’t be preserved if there is a “fail[ure] to object at all. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 2:14 pm
This was common ground, however, Mr B pointed out he had not accepted the cheque, didn’t want the deposit returned and had never cashed it. [read post]
