Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 3581 - 3600
of 21,685
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2022, 8:31 am
Eyenavision, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 1:45 pm
Desmond v. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 8:55 am
, Crabtree v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 2:08 pm
Koller, 472 U.S. 424, 430–31(1985) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted); seealso Cohen v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 6:44 pm
When it heard oral argument in Pearson v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 6:02 am
Department of Transportation v. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
Following a statement from the Secretariat of State warning against unauthorised use and misuse of the image of Pope Francis, the Secretariat of State has hired a well-known law firm to monitor and repress any unauthorised third-party uses of the image of His Holiness. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 8:29 pm
In the appropriately named Liberty v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 2:20 pm
Kraemer has a lot to say about state enforcement of cultural beliefs; NYT v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 9:00 am
Coach v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 3:24 am
The Société Anonyme Des Bains De Mer Et Du Cercle Des Étrangers À Monaco (mercifully abbreviated by the judge to 'SBM') owned the Casino de Monte-Carlo and enjoyed the state monopoly in relation to the provision of casino gaming services in Monaco. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 6:12 pm
In Powell v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 3:59 am
Co. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 9:00 pm
Mark, 425 F.3d 505, 508-11 (8th Cir. 2005); Holm, 326 F.3d at 877-78; United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 5:03 am
Doe miss the mark. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 9:00 pm
The case is Lopez v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 9:01 am
This year marks the 75th anniversary of the State Bar of Texas. [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
After all, "holiday" is no more than a state of mind, surely. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
He comments on the decision of Judge Hacon in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court in William Mark Corporation & Another v Gift House International Ltd [2014] EWHC 2845 (IPEC). [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
Given the high percentage of the market open to Doncaster Pharmaceuticals even where it could not use the REGURIN trade mark, SEP's exclusive use of the REGURIN mark in the UK did not contribute to the artificial partitioning of the markets between Member States for trospium chloride. [read post]
