Search for: "Organ v. State"
Results 3581 - 3600
of 23,147
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
Subdivision 6 of Civil Service Law §209-a provides as follows: "In applying [§209-a, Improper employer practices; improper employee organization practices], fundamental distinctions between private and public employment shall be recognized, and no body of federal or state law applicable wholly or in part to private employment, shall be regarded as binding or controlling precedent. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 8:25 am
With the Supreme Court recently declaring that marriage is a constitutionally protected right, and that same-sex couples have a right to marry in every state in the Union, it would be easy for people think that gay rights organizations have won and there is nothing left to fight for of equal urgency and importance. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 6:42 pm
Bruni v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 1:03 pm
United States and United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 11:43 am
Rupp v. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 9:34 am
Professor Frank supported the Respondents with the amicus brief of Coastal States Organization. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 12:52 am
(Eli Lilly v Novopharm (2010 FCA 197)This exercise requires:Reviewing the entire specification (claims and entire disclosure)Identifying the promises made in the entire specification Determining whether the patent fulfils those promises by demonstration or sound prediction.This exercise is a question of law viewed through the skilled person at the time of filing (with the assistance of expert evidence) and has been applied in several cases (BMS v Apotex (2005 FC 1348),… [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 9:39 am
(Eli Lilly v Novopharm (2010 FCA 197)This exercise requires:Reviewing the entire specification (claims and entire disclosure)Identifying the promises made in the entire specification Determining whether the patent fulfils those promises by demonstration or sound prediction.This exercise is a question of law viewed through the skilled person at the time of filing (with the assistance of expert evidence) and has been applied in several cases (BMS v Apotex (2005 FC 1348),… [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 6:10 am
United States (1970) and Cohen v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:06 am
Indian country lost Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 8:26 am
The contribution embeds the substantive political theory of Leninist constitutionalism on which the political order is organized with its expression in the organization of the state. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 1:31 pm
Jackson Women's Health Organization, showed there is a good chance that the Supreme Court will soon overrule, or at least severely limit abortion rights long protected under Roe v. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 1:07 pm
Karl v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 8:40 pm
Apache Stronghold v USA, 38 F. 4th 742 (6/242/2022) [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:44 pm
We also find the agency's interpretation of the National Parks Organic Act and Rocky Mountain National Park Enabling Act persuasive, and that its elk management plan does not violate those statutes. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 9:30 pm
Brown on Missouri v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 6:30 am
Supreme Court decision Loving v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 6:30 am
Supreme Court decision Loving v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 9:55 am
As Predicted, Federal Circuit Rules Isolated DNA PatentableAfter much anticipation, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit earlier today issued a decision in Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 4:16 am
Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. [read post]
