Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US" Results 3581 - 3600 of 4,555
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2015, 7:06 am by Joy Waltemath
Given the uncertainty as to their precise regular rates, the court found that a conservative estimate, such as the $15 per hour approximation, was justified. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  “Meaningful” opposition—not the right standard. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:56 pm by Josh Blackman
(For example, an alien with British and Iranian citizenship would be allowed entry using his U.K. passport). [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:03 pm by Josh Blackman
For example, the Ninth Circuit held that the Fifth Circuit erred in Texas v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:01 am by Tom Dannenbaum
The Special Protections in Additional Protocol I On the standard rule, a lawful military objective under Article 52 of Protocol I is any object that by its nature, purpose, location, or use makes an effective contribution to military action, such that its destruction, capture, or neutralization would return a definite military advantage. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 11:11 am by Anna Su
More precisely, they advance a theory that strikes at the heart of the Jeffersonian wall metaphor that Everson introduced into the world. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 12:30 am
Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 8:53 am by Schachtman
It looks at the distance from the mean a value will fall, and is measured by using standard deviations. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 2:44 am
There is no mathematically precise test in deciding these cases, the Court of Appeals reminds us. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:34 am
Minor's sister also testified that when she saw the tweets, she thought they were a joke due to the use of laughing and smiling emojis and the terms for `just kidding’ and `laugh out loud. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 6:20 pm
 The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights through its Business and Human Rights Section has initiated a major initiative--the establishment of a helpdesk mechanism on business and human rights. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:24 am by Russ Bensing
  The 8th District opinions used to spend three pages discussing the standard of review for insufficiency and manifest weight claims. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 10:42 pm by Russell Jackson
  Establishing a design defect requires a risk-utility balancing, whereas the "malfunction" exception is tantamount to using a "consumer expectations" test for design defect with no justification for the switch in standards. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am by Guest Blogger
Of course no framer got what he wanted, and that is precisely the point. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
., 1994) (“The relative risk from an epidemiological study can be adapted to this 50% plus standard to yield a probability or likelihood that an agent caused an individual’s disease. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 3:17 pm by Josh Blackman
Indeed, Lukumi declined to "define with precision the standard used to evaluate whether a prohibition is of general application. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 5:27 am
I wanted to use the rule â€" precisely because it is so central to corporate law â€" as a vehicle for testing out my director primacy model. [read post]