Search for: "Person v. Person"
Results 3581 - 3600
of 123,220
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Broach & Stulberg, LLP v New York State Dept. of Labor, 195 AD3d 1133,, lv denied, 37 NY3d 914, the Appellate Division explained that FOIL requires that an agency, "in accordance with its published rules, make available for public inspection and copying all records, except those records or portions thereof that" are statutorily exempt from disclosure,* which include materials that, "if disclosed would constitute an unwarranted invasion of… [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Broach & Stulberg, LLP v New York State Dept. of Labor, 195 AD3d 1133,, lv denied, 37 NY3d 914, the Appellate Division explained that FOIL requires that an agency, "in accordance with its published rules, make available for public inspection and copying all records, except those records or portions thereof that" are statutorily exempt from disclosure,* which include materials that, "if disclosed would constitute an unwarranted invasion of… [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 4:50 am
Defendants further assert that Krane prepared the promissory notes, film financing agreement, and personal guaranty according to those terms, and that plaintiff was not interested in any input, comment, or suggestion aboutthe substance of the documents. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 1:34 am
In Vabuolas v British Columbia (Information and Privacy Commissioner) 2024 BCSC 27, two former members of the Jehovah’s Witnesses each sought disclosure from their former congregations of all records that included their personal information, relying on the terms of British Columbia’s Personal Information Protection Act SBC 2003. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:22 am
The decision in Sky UK Ltd & Anor v Riverstone Managing Agency Ltd & Ors [2023] EWHC 1207 (Comm) (22 May 2023) (bailii.org), was handed down a short time after the Court of Appeal decision in the case of FM Conway Limited v The Rugby Football Union, Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance PLC and Clark Smith Partnership Limited) [2023] EWCA Civ 418. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 10:55 pm
[Acuity v M/I Homes of Chicago LLC 2023 IL 129087] [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
The Supreme Court will consider the constitutionality of HB20 in NetChoice, LLC v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:41 pm
Wooden v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm
See State v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:59 pm
Background on Amgen v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:27 pm
Here is the entire complaint: Kestenbaum v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 10:24 am
Lawrence argues that Lincoln v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 10:01 am
Supreme Court’s reasoning in Paroline v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 8:30 am
Plaintiffs can win when someone conveys a disparaging falsehood about them, but there are numerous defenses that can force the trial court to dismiss the case prior to trial.The case is Rapaport v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 7:22 am
At 1:38, the words on screen are "Mitt Romney and the Republican Party... plan to Overturn Roe v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 6:51 am
” “Joint representation can also pose a problem when a lawyer represents more than one plaintiff in a personal injury case. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 6:44 am
The case is the first time a victim of sexual assault has relied on the public interest defence to justify naming the person responsible. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 4:05 am
In Vabuolas v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
Apparently, the ambulance driver’s statements made to officers at the scene constituted an “admission or declaration against interest” which could be used against him.Given that evidence, and the fact that PK “was approaching a red light” when he was “struck in the rear by the ambulance,” the AD1 thought PK demonstrated a “prima facie entitlement” to relief in his favor and dismissed any claims that had been filed against that Uber driver.That… [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 3:00 am
” Here is the decision: Kay v. [read post]
