Search for: "S S V STATE OF MICHIGAN" Results 3581 - 3600 of 6,440
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2007, 5:37 am
Dresbach    Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit See USA v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
“Why It Was Proper (and Necessary) to Overturn Old Precedent” [Ilya Shapiro and Aaron Barnes, Cato, earlier on Janus v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:49 pm by Record on Appeal
United States – immigration removal case where after pleading guilty of a felony the individual was removed, and whether the attorney provided effective assistance of counsel where the attorney did not advise the immigrant of the immigration consequences of the guilty plea (what does “advise” mean; is the court’s decision in Padilla prospective or retrospective; how to make the Strickland standard workable);  Evans v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 2:02 pm by Jason Shinn
The suit, a copy is available here (hiQ Labs v Linked (PDF), essentially says, everything LinkedIn threatened is a certain waste product from a bull’s digestion system. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 2:02 pm by Jason Shinn
The suit, a copy is available here (hiQ Labs v Linked (PDF), essentially says, everything LinkedIn threatened is a certain waste product from a bull’s digestion system. [read post]
9 May 2014, 6:28 am by Jeff Welty
This week, the state supreme court heard oral arguments on the retroactivity of Miller v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 9:10 pm
  The Supreme Court first recognized diversity in higher education as a "compelling" state interest in the 1978 ruling Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 1:59 pm by kblocher@hslf.org
They fought against the passage of California’s Proposition 12, the country’s strongest farm animal protection law, and then its implementation, all the way to the Supreme Court, which decided against them in National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
The Net, Inc., 388 F.3d 201, 203 (6th Cir.2004), citing Sport’s Farm LLC v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 6:15 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Michigan: prosecution for piracy of someone caught selling DVDs. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:26 pm by WIMS
In addition, as stated, it is within the agency's discretion to exercise its partial approval and disapproval power with regard to SIP submittals. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 4:24 am by Michael C. Dorf
Our column anticipated that hypocritical lawyers working for Trump would say that the Electoral Count Act is unconstitutional, despite the Supreme Court's reliance on it in Bush v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 11:45 am
Recent Supreme Court decisions such as Hudson v Michigan (2006) and Herring v United States (2009) have sparked a new debate over the efficacy of exclusionary remedy, and once again drawn its continued viability as a constitutional mandate into question. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 6:33 am by Ilya Somin
That is particularly likely in the case of the state government plaintiffs, since the Court recently adopted extremely permissive standing requirements for state plaintiffs in Massachusetts v. [read post]