Search for: "Smith v Smith" Results 3581 - 3600 of 14,450
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2021, 11:59 am by Kevin Sheerin
Directive 5006R-C § V (C) prohibits the use of the chokehold except in situations where there is deadly physical force. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 4:02 pm by admin
On June 20, 2011, the high court issued an 8-0 opinion (with Justice Sonia Sotomayor recused) in the case of American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
27 May 2022, 1:10 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:43 am by David Markus
This morning in the Washington Post, the lawyer who successfully argued Smith v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 6:12 am
In "The wounded patent survived, was only just infringed, but no injunction", here, fellow Kat Darren wrote about the decision of Birss J in Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc [2013] EWHC 3955 (Pat), a technically detailed case which amused Merpel, who commented that a case that started off being basically about chemistry ended up being basically about mathematics. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Berger
  Today's Court has not yet overruled Smith, but it has narrowed the instances in which Smith can apply. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 5:56 am by admin
Smith    Cities are for walking; it eases traffic congestion. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 6:45 am by admin
   “This is something that could be powerful,” said Abhijit V. [read post]