Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 3581 - 3600
of 26,404
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2007, 3:51 am
Holland's subsequent amendments resulted with the following claims: breach of contract (count II); breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing (count III); false light (invasion of privacy) (count IV); unfair and deceptive trade practices (count V); violation of the Lanham Act (count VI); and unjust enrichment/restitution (count VII). [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 8:08 am
While the uncorroborated testimony of co-conspirators can be sufficient to support a conviction, see United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:31 pm
In the post United States v Windsor marriage jurisprudence, couples are challenging state constitutional bans on gay marriage by metes and bounds. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:34 am
In Teamsters Local 404 Health Services & Insurance Plan v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 6:23 am
To me, eventually the entire third-party doctrine spawned from the court's Smith and Miller cases in the '70s (see here for an example of an Obama apologist using those cases to justify the NSA gobbling up everyone's cell-phone metadata ) must be reconsidered in light of the advent of cloud computing in the digital age, as Justice Sonia Sotomayor rightly argued in US v. [read post]
5 May 2019, 5:44 pm
In International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 10:59 am
The Court remanded both cases to their respective trial courts for reconsideration in light of Bush v. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 5:31 pm
But the reporting does shed a little light on one issue regarding Trump v. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 8:12 am
Delaney v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 7:43 am
This piece, which aims to shed light on the FTC’s theory of the harm in the case and its consequences for the industry, will be divided into two parts. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 12:36 pm
"Stuard v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 12:57 pm
The court cited as support State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 12:57 pm
The court cited as support State v. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 6:10 pm
"Remedies" that go unused when serious, documented prosecutorial misconduct comes to light are little better, and perhaps worse, than no remedies at all. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 6:55 pm
The New Mexico Court of Appeals addressed 4th Amendment search & seizure issues in State v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:35 am
BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:19 pm
CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC, the California Supreme Court acknowledged that, under the United States Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 12:12 pm
§ 42.11, in light of the Motion to Amend. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
In Pinkston-El-Bey v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 11:58 am
In making this argument, the SG notes that the decision to recognize Massachusetts’ standing in Mass v. [read post]
