Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 3581 - 3600
of 13,237
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2020, 4:03 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 7:02 am
The Court denied review of Price v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 5:34 am
It denied the LLPs’ claim in relation to 75% of the first year capital allowances and held that only 25% of the price paid by the LLP to the MCashback had been properly incurred on the acquisition of software. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 10:32 am
In OIP Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:43 am
Rockwell International Corp.Docket: 10-1377Issue(s): (1) Whether state substantive law controls the standard of compensable harm in suits under the Price-Anderson Act, or whether the Act instead imposes a federal standard; and (2) whether, if a federal standard applies, a property owner whose land has been contaminated by radioactive plutonium, resulting in lost property value, must show some physical injury to the property beyond the contamination itself in order to recover for… [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
It is worth noting, however, that the high court previously ruled that gender discrimination based on gender stereotypes is unlawful (Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 9:45 am
Dixon Gas Club LLC v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 7:32 am
The recent decision by the Delaware Court of Chancery in Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 2:42 pm
The case is Princo Corp. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 7:23 am
While the Public Health Law contains no provision allowing people to sue the medical provider for price gauging, the state can impose a civil penalty for these violations, up to $2,000 for each violation. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 1:54 pm
In the closing days of its September term, the Illinois Supreme Court agreed to take up Price v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 8:04 am
McManus v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 2:01 pm
Trump v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 7:56 am
The post Yale's Opposition to Plaintiffs' Pseudonymity in <i>Doe v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 8:18 am
Created under New Rule 610T of Regulation NMS, the pilot subjects exchange transaction-fee pricing, including "maker-taker" fee-and-rebate pricing models, to new temporary pricing restrictions across three test groups. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 10:48 am
These fees either increase the price over what was advertised or negate any discounts the consumers negotiated. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 8:22 am
A unanimous Second Circuit panel opinion this morning in US v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 6:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 3:08 am
By now I hope most readers are familiar with the case of John Wiley v. [read post]
