Search for: "State v. Word" Results 3581 - 3600 of 40,644
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2022, 3:15 am by CMS
The Supreme Court closely considered the true construction of the 2002 Act in their judgment, stating that the appeal turned upon the interpretation of the relevant provisions of the legislation. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:53 pm by Gerard Magliocca
 Now I’ll grant that you could say that this is just a matter for Congress or state legislatures. [read post]
8 May 2019, 9:10 am by Rob Cohen
Congress used different words to describe these two concepts, and while they are related, the words are different. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
In other words, there are no simple answers in administrative law. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:32 pm by Lorene Park
Reasoning that, unlike the Rehabilitation Act, the text of the ADA never used the word “solely” with respect to its causation standard, and that different words convey different meanings, the Sixth Circuit unanimously reversed course after 17 years of precedent and held that the ADA does not require a plaintiff to show that his or her disability was the “sole” cause of an adverse employment action (Lewis v Humboldt Acquisition Corp, Inc, dba… [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 9:26 am by Eric
However, Google’s contract breach counterclaim highlights how Google got caught in flagrante delicto in its collections suit against myTriggers by bringing that suit in Ohio state court. [read post]