Search for: "Doe, Appeal of" Results 3601 - 3620 of 107,977
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2011, 3:07 pm by Alex Braboy, ACLU
district judge dismissed the case, but the ACLU is appealing, and our argument is anything but half-baked. [read post]
13 May 2021, 11:29 am by umbrella
The court said “it is said that the appellant has no assets when it suits his purpose, but cam produce assets when it does, such as when resisting a motion for security for costs. [read post]
13 May 2021, 11:29 am by umbrella
The court said “it is said that the appellant has no assets when it suits his purpose, but cam produce assets when it does, such as when resisting a motion for security for costs. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 6:00 am by Christopher Tyner
  The court explained that G.S. 15A-974(a)(2) “does not provide a mechanism by which [the defendant] could allege evidence was obtained as a result of a substantial violation of Chapter 15. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 11:40 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Abercrombies & Fitch and many others ,Parallel lost its appeal at the CAFC.The CAFC noted:Despite the many issues raised on appeal, this case reduces, as the district court ruled, to a fairly simple analysis. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 8:10 am
The court system does not enjoy hearing repetitive litigation if it can be avoided. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
Procedural fairness does not require an oral hearing in all circumstances. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 5:20 pm
Section 2576 does not require that such specification should be made, nor is it elsewhere prescribed, but this, as is claimed, is an implication from the language of the section. [read post]
5 May 2009, 9:28 am
The legal indispensability of a employee's job does not influence whether that employee is eligible for overtime, the court wrote. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 12:48 pm by Dennis Crouch
See also: http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2007/09/how-long-does-a.html (2007). [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 8:56 am by Peter Howard Tilem
The court acknowledged this new law but ultimately ruled that the law does not apply to convictions that occurred before the passage of the law in 2021. [read post]