Search for: "Hope v. Hope" Results 3601 - 3620 of 23,977
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2016, 8:23 am
My criticism was both technical (Chemerinsky suggested that the October 2014 term may be followed by The Empire Strikes Back), and based on a desire for the ideal Star Wars metaphor (I suggested that Star Wars: A New Hope would serve as a better analogy).While I stand by my technical criticism (Empire came before Jedi, damn it!) [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Jon Hyman
I know this fact is true because I just read Bradford v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 7:58 am by Thomas Baer
”Law Journal PressTo locate antitrust titles in Law Journal Press, choose “Antitrust” from the “Practice Area” dropdown menu.Antitrust Basics by Thomas V. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 10:30 am by Unknown
Blog posts & press:Asylum in Europe 2019: Human Rights under Pressure (AIDA, Aug. 2020) [text]EU’s Planned ‘Deportation Machine’: Expensive, Dangerous and Lacking in Transparency and Accountability Measures (Statewatch, Aug. 2020) [text]How the Coronavirus Pandemic may be Shaping Our Feelings about People Crossing the Channel in Small Boats (The Conversation, Aug. 2020) [text]I've Been Watching Desperate People Seek Protection in Europe for 20 Years – It's Time… [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 8:53 am
"Marty" Schwimmer and Yours Truly will share the spotlight in what we hope to be an informative and entertaining presentation. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 7:24 am by Robert Chesney, Steve Vladeck
Here’s hoping there is less to discuss in our second year! [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 5:12 pm by Melissa Srago
We hope you and your friends can join us live for both events! [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:10 pm
It's Canary Wharf Group Ltd v Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2015] EWHC 1588 (Ch), an 8 June Chancery Division, England and Wales, decision of Iain Purvis QC, sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court on an appeal from the UK Intellectual Property Office. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 8:58 am by Michael C. Dorf
True, Jackson opposed the bank on policy grounds, but he also denied that the Supreme Court decision in McCulloch v. [read post]