Search for: "In re D. W." Results 3601 - 3620 of 4,486
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The issues:The court reasoned that “Mylan’sANDA specification [would] allow[] it to market a drugproduct with Asp9 . . . levels from 0.0%–2.0%, a range thatincludes the ’727 patent’s claimed ranges of 0.0–0.6%,”and “[w]hat a generic applicant asks for and receivesapproval to market, if within the scope of a valid claim, isan infringement. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am by Eugene Volokh
The assurance of fairness preserved by public presence at a trial is not lost when one party's cause is pursued under a fictitious name.[8] Nonetheless, even courts that take this view acknowledge that "there remains a clear and strong First Amendment interest in ensuring that '[w]hat transpires in the courtroom is public property.'"[9] And other courts put it even more strongly: [L]awsuits are public events and the public has a legitimate interest in knowing the… [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 4:23 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
In this week’s New York Business Divorce, we’re excited to write about what seems to be the very first New York appellate court decision in a marijuana industry business divorce dispute. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 1:34 pm
In re Bilski, 545 F.3d 943, 956 (Fed. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 9:14 am by Robert Liles
In most cases, the OIG has the authority to impose a penalty of up to $10,000 for each individual violation, however, this is increased to $25,000 for violations with respect to Managed Care Organizations, Medicare Advantage Plans and Part D Contractors. [read post]
5 May 2011, 9:28 am by sasqi
Liriano sported a 9+ ERA, and a 1-4 record; his control was so erratic that he'd walked almost as many hitters as he'd struck out, almost one per inning. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 9:14 am by Robert Liles
In most cases, the OIG has the authority to impose a penalty of up to $10,000 for each individual violation, however, this is increased to $25,000 for violations with respect to Managed Care Organizations, Medicare Advantage Plans and Part D Contractors. [read post]
Finally, the Supreme Court’s refusal to re-engage will likely increase the pressure on Congress to enact a legislative “fix” to § 101. 3. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 2:37 pm by Eugene Volokh
[In Locke,] "[w]e conclude[d] that Florida's license requirement [was] constitutional under the First Amendment[.] [read post]