Search for: "Land v. United States"
Results 3601 - 3620
of 6,678
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2019, 6:09 am
Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington noted that U.S. courts simply don't rule on foreign patents, citing one case in which a U.S. district court declined to do so even though both parties asked for a determination involving a foreign patent.Lord Kitchin is not among the three Supreme Court judges hearing the case now. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 6:00 am
City of New London, in which the United States Supreme Court held that New London could use eminent domain to transfer land to private developers for the purpose of stimulating economic development. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 4:19 am
United States, in which Gorsuch “sets forth a property rights-based argument for the protection of cell phone data under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
(2) Does the ICCTA preempt a state agency’s voluntary commitments to comply with CEQA as a condition of receiving state funds for a state owned rail line and/or leasing state-owned property? [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 9:05 pm
United States—is subject to two exceptions. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 5:00 am
He eventually brought his case to the Supreme Court, relying upon a law, 42 U.S.C. 1982, written and passed by Congress that says: "All citizens of the United States shall have the same right, in every state and Territory, as is enjoyed by white citizens thereof to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold, and convey real and personal property. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 6:38 am
Last week, the Court handed Riegel v Medtronic, 128 S. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:07 pm
As Janer prepares to test the defense in Bay County, a state Court of Appeals is grappling with the same issues in the case of People v. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 4:08 am
United States, No 04-41196 (5th Cir., Oct. 11, 2006). [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 5:46 am
Under the DACA program, they are permitted to remain in the United States for some period of time as long as they meet certain conditions. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 8:41 am
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote the opinion in Yellen v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 7:26 am
The Pavseks filed a complaint against Appellees alleging, among other things, that Appellees have been using the properties Appellees' own or manage as transient vacation units and/or bed and breakfast homes in violation of the City and County of Honolulu (City) Land Use Ordinance. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 5:28 am
See, Bennett v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 4:23 pm
Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment disqualifies from holding state or federal office any person who has participated in an insurrection or rebellion against the United States. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 3:33 am
Cruikshank and United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 2:59 am
The federal court agreed with the church and the United States. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:30 am
By Eric SegallFor far too long the United States Supreme Court has unduly interfered in our local, regional, and national politics. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 6:40 pm
United States, made clear that private landowners could not make exclusive use of public lands and resources, holding a Nevada cattle rancher had violated the Unlawful Inclosures act after he fenced off nearly 20,000 acres. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 7:18 am
U.S. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm
Drummond, 13-496, a state-on-top habeas petition involving when a rule is “clearly established” for purposes of the stringent review provisions of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act and which comes to us from the land of country music and non-union autoworkers, appears to be a hold after all – perhaps for White v. [read post]
