Search for: "Long v. Williams" Results 3601 - 3620 of 4,810
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V A fugitive criminal shall not be surrendered under the provisions hereof when, by lapse of time, he is exempt from prosecution or punishment for the crime or offence for which the surrender is asked, according to the laws of the country from which the extradition is demanded, or when his extradition is asked for the same crime or offence for which he has been tried, convicted or acquitted in that country, or so long as he is under prosecution for the same. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm by Eugene Volokh
Williams, 616 F.3d 685, 692–94 (7th Cir.2010) (applying intermediate scrutiny to review of § 922(g)(1)); United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:24 pm by PaulKostro
Long, 173 N.J. 138, 164-65 (2002); see State v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 4:32 pm by Shahram Miri
See Hearst v Ganzi (2006) 145 CA4th 1195. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 12:34 pm by Tobias Thienel
In that, the case is a lot like Rantsev v Cyprus and Russia and Siliadin v France (which the judge duly applied). [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 5:00 am by Bryan Florendo
  The proxy statement shows that the company paid its directors the following amounts in 2010: Name Fees Earned or Paid in Cash($) Stock Awards($) Option Awards($) All Other Compensation($) Total($) William V. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 4:51 am by Broc Romanek
Delaware Addresses Advance Notice For Shareholder Proposals From Steven Haas of Hunton & Williams: Last Friday, the Court of Chancery issued an interesting decision in Goggin v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:38 am by Mathew Purchase, Matrix.
The primary issue before the Divisional Court (Moses LJ and Wyn Williams J) was whether that court was bound by the House of Lords judgment or the European Court of Human Rights judgment. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 1:23 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
Williams, 576 F.3d 385, 390 (7th Cir. 2009) (“The failure to inquire how long the defense needs to prepare suggests that the district court unreasonably considered any delay unacceptable: That sort of rigidity can only be characterized as arbitrary. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 1:10 pm by Michael O'Hear
Williams, 576 F.3d 385, 390 (7th Cir. 2009) (“The failure to inquire how long the defense needs to prepare suggests that the district court unreasonably considered any delay unacceptable: That sort of rigidity can only be characterized as arbitrary. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:15 pm by Michelle Lindo McCluer
  At this, Judge Tozzi broke in again and asserted that military justice has come a long way from the pre-UCMJ days. [read post]