Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 3601 - 3620
of 5,981
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2013, 10:53 am
Philip C. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 9:05 am
Apparently, Bryson has never heard of Linus Pauling and his Vitamin C fiasco. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 3:42 am
[C[onsumers are familiar with bicycle enclosures that have different shapes. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:56 am
The account received by the IPKat does not name either party, but Merpel has a pretty good idea who the plaintiff may be. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 3:01 pm
The opinion of the ECtHR in Al Khawaja and Tahery applying Article 6 of the European Convention was that there is no technical rule of law requiring ―corroboration‖ or any other specific type of verification for hearsay evidence, but that the trier of fact must undertake a ―fair and proper assessment of the reliability of [hearsay] evidence,‖ and only where ―such evidence is sufficiently reliable given its importance in the case‖ may that evidence be the basis for… [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 3:24 am
Since no reputation had been proved for the Monte-Carlo mark, the claim for infringement under Article 9(1)(c) of the same Regulation had to fail. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013) I have been posting about the development of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law." [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 2:19 pm
As we already know from Case C-307/10 Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys (the IP Translator case), they should also beware blindly following registry guidelines. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 10:55 am
WARN Act cases, when they are brought, may be good subjects for class treatment. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 2:24 pm
John’s University School of LawMembers · Barton Beebe, New York University Law School · David C. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 4:14 am
Section 2(c) - Consent to Register:TTAB Affirms Section 2(c) Refusal of MARTIN & WEYRICH ROSSO ALLEGRO for WineSection 2(d) - Likelihood of Confusion: Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Are REAL CHOICE and CLEARCHOICE DENTAL IMPLANTS Confusable for Implant Services? [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 6:53 pm
Division of Power: (a) Executive; (b) Legislative; (c) Judicial --U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 6:24 pm
This is consistent with the language of section l.l(a) (C), in which Abboud sold to JA Apparel the right to use and apply for new marks containing Abboud’s personal name. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:05 am
”10 Section 512(c)(1)(C) also requires social media companies and service providers to promptly remove or disable access to infringing material upon receipt of a written notice from a copyright holder that substantially complies with the requirements of § 512(c)(3). [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 2:31 pm
Dawson, Mark Atkinson and Peter C. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 8:33 am
SL: Good question. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 3:02 am
"[B]rand clarity is a consumer good," and the attacks on dilution law as protecting marks, not consumers, are off the mark.He believes that the "guidelines" incorporated into the TDRA "will facilitate predictability and ameliorate the expense of dilution protection." [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 1:14 am
It makes for good bedtime reading but it is not a bedtime story. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
[The expert] testified that it was neither standard nor appropriate to look physician by physician.Id. at 30 (citation and quotation marks omitte [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:55 am
– Want more taxgirl goodness? [read post]
