Search for: "Matter of Martin"
Results 3601 - 3620
of 5,942
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2012, 8:15 pm
It doesn’t matter. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 1:02 pm
The Ford Motor Company is a multinational automobile-manufacturing corporation that produces the Ford and Lincoln brands, as well as owns stakes in Mazda, Aston Martin, Jaguar, Land Rover, and Volvo. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 12:15 pm
It distinguished the earlier case law on the matter and laid down general guidelines for the grant of anti-suit injunctions enforcing non-exclusive jurisdiction agreements. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 5:50 am
Ø “Property is intended to serve life, & no matter how much we surround it with rights & respect, it has no personal being. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 1:47 am
. - Why should consent matter? [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:24 am
Perhaps whites and Asians have never heard of racial profiling or the Trayvon Martin case, for example. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 3:04 am
.; 2012 NY Slip Op 32247(U); August 23, 2012; Supreme Court, New York County; Docket Number: 108692/07; Judge: Martin Shulman is a classic immigration legal malpractice matter. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:56 pm
9:03: Maryland Governor Martin O'Malley. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 12:17 pm
Strictly speaking, (3) does not follow as a matter of logic from (1) and (2). [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 11:05 pm
Cases here: http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/KeyMadoff546Cases-SDNY-2010-11.pdf … B-SDNY: Picard's common law non-fraud claims ag insiders for failure to supervise, etc, not preempted by NY Martin Act. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/PicardvsMadoffs-BK-SDNY-Lifland-9-22-11.pdf … B-SDNY: Wagoner & in pari delicto rules dont apply to insiders so Picard has standing sue them for common law fraud.… [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:09 am
She’ll keep getting paid, no matter what we do. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:09 am
She’ll keep getting paid, no matter what we do. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:41 am
Marlow in the novel becomes Captain Willard, played by Martin Sheen. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 8:24 am
., Bogota, Colombia; Calle 137 No. 52-37, Rincon Iberia, Bogota, Colombia; San Martin, Meta, Colombia; DOB 13 Jun 1965; Cedula No. 79344969 (Colombia) (individual) [SDNTK]. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 8:14 am
HODWALKER MARTINEZ, Martin David), c/o VERANILLO DIVE CENTER LTDA., Barranquilla, Colombia; c/o MARTIN HODWALKER M. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 1:30 am
Now that the court is entering its fourth year, and now that the issue of dissentience on the court has become a matter of public debate, it seems opportune to revisit the issue. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm
Parliamentarians are still in recess, Lord Justice Leveson has finished taking evidence for Part 1 of his Inquiry, the Michaelmas legal term has not yet begun, but there have been more than enough media law related developments to justify a mid-summer round up, including new dates for the autumn calendar. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 1:05 pm
Martin Stanberry In another foray by the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or the “Board”) into new territory affecting non-union workplaces, a divided three-member Board panel found that an employer’s direction that employees not discuss matters under investigation with their co-workers violated Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (the “Act”) because it “had a reasonable tendency to coerce employees in the… [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 1:00 pm
Martin Stanberry In another foray by the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or the “Board”) into new territory affecting non-union workplaces, a divided three-member Board panel found that an employer’s direction that employees not discuss matters under investigation with their co-workers violated Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (the “Act”) because it “had a reasonable tendency to coerce employees in the… [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 12:00 pm
Martin Stanberry In another foray by the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or the “Board”) into new territory affecting non-union workplaces, a divided three-member Board panel found that an employer’s direction that employees not discuss matters under investigation with their co-workers violated Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (the “Act”) because it “had a reasonable tendency to coerce employees in the… [read post]
