Search for: "People v. James"
Results 3601 - 3620
of 4,078
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2008, 4:05 pm
"Elrod v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
” But one explanation for populism, obviously, is a justified belief that governmental institutions have been captured by elites who fit James Madison’s notion of a “faction,” i.e., representatives of distinctly partial interests rather than people genuinely committed to something that might be termed “the public interest. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
” Marquart v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 9:52 am
Some studies rely on parents’ reporting; not persuasive v. studies where a doctor confirms that the event occurred. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 7:00 am
David V. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:42 pm
In fact, the United Nations Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples requires that states acquired the free and informed consent of Indigenous governments and people before taking action detrimental to those peoples, giving rise to a kind of literal consent theory and practice desperately needed in American Indian affairs.Justice Scalia and the Art of RhetoricJeffrey M. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
(Houseman v. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 10:29 am
McGill v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
Prior to 2012, when the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 7:27 am
And Gundy v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:21 am
So this was different from the troop of Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, looting during the 16th century. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 9:14 pm
[An attack on the independence of the federal judiciary.] [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
They were popular domestic terrorists even though responsible for, more than 200 bombings and dozens of robberies between 1963 and 1970 that left six people dead, and the kidnapping of the British trade commissioner, and the kidnapping and murder of a Quebec government cabinet minister. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 7:48 am
The Supreme Court in its famous 1969 Brandenburg v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am
Republican politicians have embraced immigration as a potent political issue. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
” There is no doubt that Hasen’s proposed amendment would cure, for once and for all, the lacunae announced (and embraced) by the Supreme Court in Bush v. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
FTC v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
(O’Reilly, James T., Dialogue with the Designers: Comparative Influences on Products Design Norms Imposed by Regulators and by the Third Restatement of Products Liability, 26 N. [read post]
