Search for: "People v. Sole" Results 3601 - 3620 of 6,179
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2010, 8:12 am by PaulKostro
Steps to bar participation solely on such grounds would be an unwarranted discrimination. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 10:43 am by Eugene Volokh
But I wanted to flag this, because it does seem like a serious departure from the traditional approach—and one that would apply to a wide range of working animals (at least as long as they are working for a company, rather than just for a sole proprietor). [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps discusses Hasty v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 5:03 am by Eugene Volokh
The IJ people gave an answer there, and IJ's David Hodges has kindly written it up for me to post: In September, Linda Greenhouse of the New York Timesnoted something "odd" about Espinoza v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:43 am by WSLL
You’re agreeable to make restitution to those people also? [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 4:16 pm by Jag
” [51] Lord Toulson in the sole dissenting opinion found the interference with the right to privacy to be disproportionate. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am by John Ehrett
Maryland and that this failure prejudiced the defense; and (2) whether the Louisiana courts erred in failing to find that petitioner’s sole attorney provided ineffective representation at the guilt phase of trial under Strickland v. [read post]