Search for: "People v. White" Results 3601 - 3620 of 7,175
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2012, 9:17 am by Steve Hall
That conviction was overturned by the high court, which ruled 8-1 that prosecutors violated Brady v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:03 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Hundreds of people lost their lives in just over a month of fighting in 1862. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 4:51 am by Rumpole
The sharper legal eagles amongst our readers know that the right of women to walk topless in public in the Bare Big Apple was secured in the landmark 1992 case of People v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 2:44 pm
The issue was before the Court in Board of Ed. v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 6:04 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Microsoft falls behind Apple for first time in 20 years | The Guardian: - http://bit.ly/jo4RRtThe Devil likely died happy - http://is.gd/UeR4NiBin Laden Killed: The Nation Reacts | TPM Photo Galleries - http://goo.gl/gyaqHOsama bin Laden is dead, Obama says - http://goo.gl/KrHzAU.S. cables dissect Canada's leaders: WikiLeaks - http://goo.gl/qmD6FCongrats to Michael Fitzgibbon on 8 years of blogging at Thoughts From a Management Lawyer - http://bit.ly/jG15mtCanada Votes on Monday: Employee… [read post]
” This is the first redistricting in Georgia since the 2013 Supreme Court decision Shelby County v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 10:53 am
The Fair Pay Act would restore access to civil justice for women who've been denied equal pay, and who under Ledbetter v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:04 pm by rstokes
They included 69 subjects with an average age of 13.4, and GMFCS level IV or V cerebral palsy. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 5:09 am by OBABL Staff
We’ll have to read Professor Maillard’s book “Loving v. [read post]
Out of the 100 successful applicants 18 were women, 13 declared an ethnic origin other than white, five declared a disability, and 11 were aged over 50. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:27 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
As a Legal Post article discussing Tossonian v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 2:22 pm by Giles Peaker
Escott, R (On the application of) v Chichester District Council (2020) EWHC 1687 (Admin) A judicial review where the relevant parts played out in the early stages of the pandemic lockdown, and where the central question was whether self contained accommodation provided without a fridge, cooker and bed, was suitable within the meaning of section 206 Housing Act 1996, such that interim relief could be ordered. [read post]