Search for: "Phillips v. Phillips"
Results 3601 - 3620
of 3,830
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2015, 7:18 pm
Grant v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 2:50 am
Co. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:45 pm
Failure to Function/Non-distinctiveness:TTAB Finds Religious Habit Not Registrable: Lacks Distinctiveness, Inherent or AcquiredFamous Marks Doctrine:Precedential No. 17: TTAB Dismisses Bayer "FLANAX" Cancellation Claims - No Famous Marks Exception in US LawFraud:Precedential No. 23: TTAB Refuses to Hear Belated Fraud Claim, Finding It Not Tried By ConsentPrecedential No. 21: TTAB Sustains "PALOMA" 2(d) Opposition to "PALOMITA" for Clothing, But Dismisses Claim for… [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:37 pm
John Fund v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:03 am
Path. et al. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 4:12 am
Phillips and Nationwide Ins. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:02 am
CORIOLAN, Appellant, v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:30 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm
Praise rightly goes to Jeremy Phillips and Ilanah Fhima for this death-defying feat, attributable, I believe, to their lack of hubris and commitment to encouraging stars like Professor Eleonora Rosati to first become contributors, then editors.The book under review is a testament to the blog’s enduring ability to attract the best legal minds in IP to write for it and for free. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 9:04 pm
The details follow:Cholewka v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:39 pm
In three recent posts, I've sharply criticized briefs filed by the Department of Justice--and by the Solicitor General, in particular--in the various iterations of the Hargan v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
" U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, February 05, 2008 Phillips v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Supreme Court, March 19, 2008 Snyder v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 12:39 pm
That last point, the runaway jury awarding punitive damages on its own volition, particularly troubles us, because in Phillip Morris USA v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:47 am
In Pearson v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 12:33 pm
Elliott v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 5:51 pm
In Shevill v Presse Alliance ([1996] AC 959 and [1995] ECR I-415) it was held that publication of defamatory material in this jurisdiction is a “harmful event” for the purposes of Art. 5(3). [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 12:39 am
Then along came Lawrence v. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 10:01 pm
Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:36 am
Australia resisted an ISDS challenge of its tobacco plain packaging by Phillip Morris on technical jurisdictional grounds and prevailed. [read post]
