Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 3601 - 3620
of 178,378
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
Kirk reported Turcotte's conduct to the responding officer, Sara Schutte, who then walked away from Kirk and began speaking to a third-party witness. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
The appellate court additionally found that the trial court had erred in excluding the Plaintiff’s medical records entirely as hearsay. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 4:32 am
The lower court granted the defendant’s pre-answer dismissal motion following which the plaintiff appealed. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 4:30 am
The plaintiff claimed to have met the PIP’s objectives. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 4:10 am
Among the 34 separate claims in the lawsuit was a claim that the city's failure to deal with air quality problems caused pollution and odors that interfered with plaintiffs' ability to attend congregational worship services. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:54 am
Plaintiffs also failed to make a prima facie showing of long-arm jurisdiction over the Button defendants pursuant to CPLR 302 (a) (3), inasmuch as plaintiffs’ alleged injuries did not occur within New York but, rather, in Texas, where the Button defendants’ alleged legal malpractice occurred (see Bloomgarden, 143 AD3d at 852; see generally Zeidan v Scott’s Dev. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am
Ali’s statements. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 11:00 pm
”But because the store failed to provide specifics as to its employees’ actions on the date in question, and neglected to submit any evidence as to when the sidewalk was “last cleaned or inspected,” the AD2 agreed that the store failed to meet is burden of proof (that it lacked constructive notice of the existence of sidewalk ice) in this instance.Additionally, since it was unclear whether A.M. fell due to an ice patch, or whether he came into contact with a scaffolding pole… [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 6:09 pm
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 3:30 pm
The Sixth Circuit ruled that a plaintiff had standing to lodge a pre-enforcement challenge to Ohio's criminal ban on ballot selfies. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 9:31 pm
’” Indeed, the district court also referred favorably to plaintiffs having, in the court’s view, “indicated that 929,000 tweets were political speech by American citizens. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:35 pm
Let's walk through the numbers. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 4:05 pm
Roy are so bizarre that it’s tough to propose a solution. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 3:02 pm
” The Supreme Court recognized, however, that there are situations where a plaintiff may have valid tortious interference claim based on the plaintiff’s reasonable expectation of future business from a recurring practice of performing work for certain clients. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 11:44 am
In a ruling dated 20 October 2020, the court upheld the copyright protection of the "Tam Tam" stool but dismissed the plaintiff's infringement action. [read post]
US Supreme Court rules public officials can be sued for blocking users on social media in some cases
16 Mar 2024, 11:28 am
If the plaintiff cannot make this threshold showing of authority, he cannot establish state action. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 10:31 am
.) -- dismissing plaintiff’s claim against DOJ and ATF because he never submitted a request to either of them, and determining that USDA performed an adequate search for records concerning ATF’s contributions to plaintiff’s pension (and finding no records). [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 10:24 am
.) -- ruling that: (1) plaintiff was not required to exhaust administrative remedies to maintain a pattern-or-practice claim alleging delays in responses by the Federal Bureau of Prisons to counsel requests for client records; (2) government was entitled to summary judgment on plaintiff’s pattern-or-practice claim because plaintiff failed to rebut defendant’s evidence that it did not have a policy or practice of violating FOIA; and (3) in the… [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 7:50 am
Does the economic loss rule apply to the plaintiff’s claims against the distributor? [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:39 am
For comment deletion, “the only relevant posts are those from which [the plaintiff’s] comments were removed. [read post]
