Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 3601 - 3620
of 15,301
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
" (NSBA v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:56 pm
He held that the press statement meant (a) that a jury had already found that the claimant murdered Kamila; (b) that the evidence as it stood in July 2009 showed that he probably killed her, which was sufficient to justify proceeding with a retrial; and (c) that the CPS’s decision to offer no evidence was therefore wrong [10]. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am
This appeal will consider a number of important issues relating to the State’s obligations under ECHR, art 2. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 12:27 pm
§1056[d][3][B][ii][I]; CPLR 5205[c][4].) [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 4:58 am
C.12, s. 20(1). [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:35 am
B-88-00316-CA, 729 F. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm
And he explained Tansey v Gill as a case in which the judge was fully satisfied that the defendant could have no defence to the proceedings, thereby fulfilling the terms section 33(1)(b). [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 1:52 pm
The case of United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 10:28 am
State v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
The Supreme Court has explained that a State’s right to investigate suspected crimes justifies its questioning of suspects under oath and other aspects of an investigati [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 4:18 am
A recent Federal Circuit decision illustrates the high eligibility hurdles that fintech software patents continue to face in view of the Supreme Court’s 2014 Alice v CLS Bank decision. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 10:56 am
§314.70(c)(6). [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 10:14 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Ninth Circuit) issued an opinion in the latest chlorpyrifos case (League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
Under Rule 45(b)(2), a subpoena may be served only: (A) within the court’s district; (B) within 100 miles of the place specified for the deposition or the production of documents; (C) elsewhere within the state where the issuing court sits; or (D) at any other place “that the court authorizes on motion and for good cause, if a federal statute so provides. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
The member filed his application relying upon the statutory presumption contained in Retirement and Social Security Law §507-b(c). [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 2:23 pm
Code § 636(c) and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 72(a). [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 10:27 am
DEQCitation: 2010 WY 25Docket Number: S-09-0037Rule 12.09(b) Certification from the District court of Laramie County, the Honorable Edward L. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 10:34 am
Lee v. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
Pupil B, who attends a large state-run school which provides swimming lessons run by the school’s staff, has protection as the local authority is vicariously liable for the negligence of its staff. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
Pupil B, who attends a large state-run school which provides swimming lessons run by the school’s staff, has protection as the local authority is vicariously liable for the negligence of its staff. [read post]
