Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 3621 - 3640
of 48,955
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2015, 9:13 am
It is called Warren v. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 6:30 am
” Stroud v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 9:05 pm
Circuit, Janice Rogers Brown’s concurrence in Gross v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:28 am
In Williamson v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 3:58 pm
(v) Consultation should be carried out on the proposal that where a housing claim is settled in favour of a legally aided party, that party should have the right to ask the court to determine which party should pay the costs of the proceedings. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 3:58 pm
(v) Consultation should be carried out on the proposal that where a housing claim is settled in favour of a legally aided party, that party should have the right to ask the court to determine which party should pay the costs of the proceedings. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 7:54 am
In Anadarko Petroleum Corp. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 5:00 am
Hampshire Group Limited v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
The SEC filed its response in Business Roundtable v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 11:34 am
There’s nothing particularly new or ground-breaking about the recent Ontario Superior Court Decision in Sierra Excavating v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 10:11 am
Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 11:35 am
See TiVo v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Courts must defer to an agency's interpretation of its own regulations in its area of expertiseAbramoski v New York State Educ. [read post]
8 May 2014, 3:22 am
However, the appellant had incurred costs of £772,547 in security, legal expenses and fees and applied for permission to receive these costs from the company’s funds. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 12:53 pm
Bis v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 12:01 pm
Both Kalitan and the Defendants appealed the decision and the Fourth District Court of Appeals reversed based upon the Florida Supreme Court’s decision in Estate of McCall v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:45 pm
v=Uk8x3V-sUgU [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 7:34 am
Complaint Trademark Ihop v Ihop [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 8:27 pm
” Traditional wisdom as to cases that go to trial can be found in Master Hurst’s comments in Designer Guild Ltd v Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd (t/a Washington DC) (No 2) [2003] EWHC 9024 (Costs): “There is an argument for saying that in any case which reached trial a success fee of 100% is easily justified because both sides presumably believed that they had an arguable and winnable case. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 7:46 pm
Yesterday, the Hawaii Supreme Court here accepted certiorari in Thomas v. [read post]
