Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 3621 - 3640
of 9,549
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2011, 5:14 am
The specification required by 35 USC 111 (b)(1)(a) must support claims in the later-filed nonprovisional. [read post]
17 May 2010, 11:50 am
State Tax Incentives The new Act does not reduce federal credits based on state benefits, unless the combination would exceed the employer's contribution. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 1:51 pm
Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 93 S.Ct. 705, 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973). [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:34 am
Lloyd LJ made clear that section 49A(1)(d) does not allow the council to leave the question of Sam’s accommodation over to be dealt with under Part 7 (at [30]).The next issue concerned remedy and this is an equally important part of the judgment because the Court decided not to set aside the possession order or dismiss the proceedings. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:34 am
Lloyd LJ made clear that section 49A(1)(d) does not allow the council to leave the question of Sam’s accommodation over to be dealt with under Part 7 (at [30]).The next issue concerned remedy and this is an equally important part of the judgment because the Court decided not to set aside the possession order or dismiss the proceedings. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:34 am
Lloyd LJ made clear that section 49A(1)(d) does not allow the council to leave the question of Sam’s accommodation over to be dealt with under Part 7 (at [30]).The next issue concerned remedy and this is an equally important part of the judgment because the Court decided not to set aside the possession order or dismiss the proceedings. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 5:50 am
Code § 35-11-210 et seq. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:16 am
” 1. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 5:50 am
Code § 35-11-210 et seq. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 12:31 pm
The Government typically does not negotiate these terms. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 3:01 pm
That is the question the Board had to deal with in the present decision.Claim 1 of the main request read:1. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 7:22 am
Last month, Righthaven finally had its day before the Ninth Circuit when it participated in oral arguments in two of its appeals (audio available here).1 These appeals almost didn’t happen. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 1:37 pm
at 34-35. [read post]
23 Jun 2007, 9:44 am
Ryan [2003] IESC 1, [2003] 1 IR 309; A (A) v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
§§1–1–113(1), 1–4–1101(1), 1–4–1201, 1–4–1203(2)(a), 1–4–1204 (2023).After a five-day trial, the state District Court found thatformer President Trump had “engaged in insurrection”within the meaning of Section 3, but nonetheless denied therespondents’ petition. [read post]
4 May 2020, 5:45 am
In the meantime, the USPTO just released a decision denying the application for a such a patent holding that under the U.S. patent law, 35 USC §§ 1 et seq. an inventor must be a natural person. [read post]
4 May 2020, 5:45 am
In the meantime, the USPTO just released a decision denying the application for a such a patent holding that under the U.S. patent law, 35 USC §§ 1 et seq. an inventor must be a natural person. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 1:49 pm
Does Brazil have a retirement visa? [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:29 am
Quebec (Attorney General), paras. 33, 35, 36). [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 11:46 pm
" 35 U.S.C. [read post]
