Search for: "Human v. State"
Results 3621 - 3640
of 19,133
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2016, 4:26 pm
The unanimous judgment in Novikova and others v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 7:56 am
Citing Jegley v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 12:03 pm
Any such expansion now awaits a successful appeal (unlikely) or action by the state legislature (sought repeatedly by advocates such as the New York State Trial Lawyers Association). [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 6:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:42 am
In Born v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 7:10 pm
The State Department's 1999 guidelines were the subject of litigation in Earth Island Inst. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:16 am
The government’s own definition states that a new human organism begins at fertilization. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:59 am
The post Case Comment – Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v James [2013] UKSC 67 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 12:15 pm
Unwired Planet v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
Thus, said the court, ECSO was not required under the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 USC §12101 et seq.) or the New York State Human Rights Law (Executive Law §296) to accommodate her disability by creating such a light duty position for her.* See also County of Erie v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 2014 NY Slip Op 07829, Appellate Division, Fourth Department** Executive Law §296(3)(b) requires employers to make reasonable… [read post]
8 May 2019, 12:30 pm
United States, winning a decision from the Inter-American Court of Human Rights holding that the United States violated international human rights law for failing to respond adequately to gender-based violence. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 3:03 pm
In the 2017 case of Ajemian v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:13 am
Judge Lourie states “[v]isualization does not cleave and isolate the particular DNA; that is the act of human invention. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 1:16 pm
A state supreme court justice in Brooklyn ruled on February 13 in Bumpus v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 12:19 am
In reaching this conclusion, the Senior Master referred to: Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22 at [132]; McKennitt v Ash [2008] QB 73 per Buxton LJ at [8]; Wainwright v The Home Office [2004] 2 AC 406 at [18]-[19] and [23], [43] and [62] Perhaps unsurprisingly, the notion of a tort of physical intrusion privacy were given short shrift. [read post]
13 May 2025, 2:38 am
Each had close ties to Washington state. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 9:55 am
Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742 (1998); Faragher v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 9:55 am
Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742 (1998); Faragher v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:07 am
Justice Kagan today wrote the Court’s unanimous opinion in National Meat Association v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:32 am
Defendants argued that because my client is a company and not a human, it could not be a “member” of the tribe for jurisdictional purposes. [read post]
