Search for: "MATTER OF J M J"
Results 3621 - 3640
of 5,063
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2012, 12:21 pm
"I'm not comparing myself to Jill Dando, but I do appear on television and it was preying on my mind. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
Obiter J also reflects on the Libor scandal: Can the law nail the Libor bankers? [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 8:24 pm
J. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm
Christiansen Forster and Ryan M. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 1:48 pm
See Lunneburg & Radford, The LSAT: A Survey of Actual Practice, 18 J. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm
That approach was adopted by Strickland J in Parker v Parker [2010] FamCA 664 (3 August 2010). [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:27 pm
OWEN M. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
In litigating scientific issues, lawyers and judges will necessarily have to engage with substantive matters. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
19 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
(Examples of going-concern aBSTs that have tendencies in this direction include not just the ambitious versions of Marxism, but also the Unger framework that Moyn defends and Kessler criticizes, and even, alas, major parts of the corpus of Jürgen Habermas, my personal favorite big social theorist.)It struck me, in reading Law and Historical Materialism, that Kessler was really defending a humble, not an ambitious, version of historical materialism. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:32 am
However, the generally accepted formulation of the test was by Grandpré J. [read post]
19 May 2015, 8:18 am
(The IP profs are still going at this, but I’m with the majority here.) [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:12 pm
By citing Charles’s case, Morris was trying to make the general point that guarding against a foreign power corrupting the president was an important matter to address—and the Founders agreed. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 11:46 am
That means any such operation must be authorized as a separation-of-powers matter—either in the sense that it is within the inherent Article II authority of the commander in chief (either as a matter of national self-defense or, perhaps, as a matter of authority that lies below the threshold of the constitutional meaning of “war”), or that some other statute (like an AUMF) covers it. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:30 pm
As you can see, although there’s a bit of a spread of subject matter here, it all circles around similar themes: people, the way people think, and the way people communicate what they think. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 12:31 pm
27% said journalists/editors, 43% someone else, 29% didn’t know; no significant differences between groups.David J. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 8:53 am
Kennedy total state public defender Benjamin J. [read post]
22 Jan 2022, 10:15 am
Director J. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 1:47 pm
Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Leda M. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 12:50 am
Amy J. [read post]
