Search for: "Marks v. State"
Results 3621 - 3640
of 19,798
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2010, 11:50 am
And these posts may be of interest to you… Joe Biden v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 5:05 am
In State v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:42 pm
Part of the explanation for the repeal notes that the 2015 Rule exceeded the authority granted to the agencies by Congress by adopting an interpretation of the “significant nexus” test provided by Justice Kennedy in his concurrence in Rapanos v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 3:04 pm
" The Court said a presumption of administrative preclusion is also supported by United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 3:09 am
" Corporacion Habanos, S.A. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 6:52 pm
The wall of separation between Church and State (Everson v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 9:55 am
Case citation: Court of Master Sommeliers v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 2:13 pm
The California Vehicle Code permits persons with disabled placards or license plates to park an unlimited time in zones that are marked with a sign that says you can only park there for a limited time. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 10:01 am
V. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 10:07 am
United States. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 9:04 pm
State v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
., the Court will hear argument in Herring v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 1:25 pm
SCOTUS granted cert today in Kentucky v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 5:19 am
Buzz Seating, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 10:26 am
For publication opinions today (2): In Mark Dorman and Tracy Dorman v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 8:34 am
Co-Sponsored by the Faculty Division and the Practice GroupsOctober 6th will mark the first day of the 2014 Supreme Court term. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 12:11 am
Per United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 7:47 am
Also, it responds directly to the junk science on attachment theory Mark Fiddler keeps pitching. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:00 pm
Furthermore, the regulation prohibits the registration of trade marks which may adversely affect a protected geographical indication and states that, as a general rule, where such a mark has already been registered, it must be invalidated. [read post]
