Search for: "No. 337" Results 3621 - 3640 of 4,432
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2017, 9:08 am
State, 2014 UT 39, ¶ 16, 337 P.3d 254 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 2:52 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
., 337 U.S. 541 (1949).The collateral order doctrine is a “narrow exception” to the final judgment rule that permits the appeal of “trial court orders affecting rights that will be irretrievably lost in the absence of an immediate appeal. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 10:45 am by Florian Mueller
But for those of us watching the cases, it means more "bring the popcorn" situations.ITC complaint against Amazon and VizioOn October 24, DivX--represented by Tensegrity's Matt Powers, whom this blog first mentioned in 2013 when he was also doing some work for Apple--filed a complaint with the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC), seeking a U.S. import ban on Amazon and Vizio devices:DivX, LLC ITC complaint In the Matter of Certain Video Processing Devices… [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 10:34 pm by Marcel Pemsel
As former prime minister of the UK Theresa May famously said: Brexit means Brexit! [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 5:53 pm by Donald Thompson
Romero–Bustamente, 337 F.3d 1104, 1108 (9th Cir.2003) (holding that a yard that was “small, enclosed, adjacent to his house, and located behind his house; under Dunn, as a matter of law ... falls within the curtilage”). [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 5:03 am
The three that were particularly considered concerned:Corkscrews - El Hogar Perfecto V OHIM (T-337/12);Umbrellas - Senz Technologies BV v OHIM, (T-22/13 and T-23/13); andBiscuits - Biscuits Poult SA v OHIM (T-494/12).We were reminded that the only relevant sense to design law is sight. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 4:18 am by Henry P Yang
For comparison, InterDigital initially pleaded an amount of $337 million ([20] – [22]) while Lenovo argued for $80 million ± 15% for all sales in the six-year term to the end of 2023 with a full release for all past sales ([26]). [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 1:35 pm by Florian Mueller
International Trade Commission (ITC) finds a violation of Section 337 and issues an exclusion order barring the importation of infringing goods, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and the ITC are responsible for determining whether imported articles fall within the scope of the exclusion order. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 5:00 am
  The more important point, however, is that Section 337(a) gives the FDA exclusive power and discretion to enforce the FDCA. [read post]
10 May 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
As Silber’s commentary explains, “[the article] attracted attention quickly, and a small swarm of academics stepped forward to build upon the ‘Cathedral’ approach” (that is, a modeling approach, in which one plays with different possible configurations of private law rights and remedies and asks about their consequences) (OI, v.1, 337). [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 5:24 am
Queste misure appaiono particolarmente giustificate nei casi in cui […] "unjustified request" / "particularly justified in those cases where" HU […] amelyek szükségesek a megalapozatlan kérelemből adódóan az alperes oldalán felmerült költségek és okozott kár fedezésére. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
Some of the main decisions here are Daimler AG v Együd Garage Gépjárműjavító és Értékesítő Kft, Coty Germany GmbH v Amazon Services Europe Sàrl, Google France SARL and Google Inc. v Louis Vuitton Malletier SA and L’Oréal SA v eBay International AG. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 4:33 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
No. 337-TA-1082, 2020 WL 2093834 (Apr. 28, 2020) (Commission opinion). [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 6:31 am
Osborn, 337 Ark. 172, 988 S.W.2d 485 (Arkansas Supreme Court 1999), both cases involving juror misconduct, in support of its contention that we have jurisdiction of this appeal pursuant to Ark. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 2:08 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
., 337 U.S. 541,546 (1949) (explaining that there is a right to appeal a “small class” of orders “which finally determine claims ofright separable from, and collateral to, rights asserted inthe action, too important to be denied review and too independent of the cause itself to require that appellate consideration be deferred until the whole case is adjudicated”).To fall within the collateral order doctrine, “an ordermust at a minimum satisfy three conditions:… [read post]