Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 3621 - 3640
of 13,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2015, 10:35 am
(Weirdly appropriate, for a “crack” case . . .)United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 7:06 am
Janus v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 9:09 am
The following day, in United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 6:10 pm
However, "[b]ecause Defendant PRC's wrongful acts alleged herein arise in connection with a commercial activity that causes a direct effect in the United Stated, Defendant PRC comes within an express exception to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, viz, 28 U.S.C. section 1605 (a)(2):(a) A foreign state shall not be immune from the jurisdiction of courts of the United States or of the States in any case - (1) in which the foreign… [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:00 am
(Dabney v. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 5:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
California Court Denies Class Certification In Reverse Discrimination Case Brought By Job Candidates
2 Apr 2021, 7:07 am
Factual Background Defendants were an Indian consulting and information technology company, with their headquarters in Noida, India, and their United States headquarters in Sunnyvale, California. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:49 pm
Here's one thing I know for sure: the United States has the power to -- and actively does -- imposes taxes on residents regardless of where they're located and regardless of whether that income is earned in other countries. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:00 pm
Also, King involves privacy in new technologies The nine-to-zero vote in the recent GPS decision, United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 2:55 am
.
GONZALES v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 2:25 pm
In June, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in City of Ontario v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
Some have called Moore v. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 12:03 pm
In fact, the court highlighted both United States Supreme Court and California Supreme Court authority recognizing the policy favoring arbitration agreements. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 5:46 pm
Alliance, with claimsfound obvious:Following a trial for patent infringement that resulted in a hung jury, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California ruled as a matter of law that U.S. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
DOMA and United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:14 pm
Late on Tuesday, Apple and Samsung filed a joint stipulation with the United States District Court for the Northern District of California concerning the addition of new products, or new product versions, to the second case pending between these parties in that district. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 12:30 pm
See United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:45 pm
But as the Sixth Circuit noted in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 12:17 pm
Clayton County, Georgia, United States Supreme Court Case No. 17–1618 (June 15, 2020) [read post]
