Search for: "State v. Born" Results 3621 - 3640 of 4,852
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2011, 10:26 am
So it is with the arbitration contract, which the UK Supreme Court has discussed at length in its recent judgment in Jivraj v Hashwani. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 2:28 pm by Richard Frank
The issues in Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 12:58 pm by Stanley D. Radtke, Esq.
He noted that drug trafficking does qualify as a felony requiring deportation.Carachuri-Rosendo, 32, was born in Mexico and came to Texas with his parents when he was five. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 10:04 pm by Kurt R. Karst
Wasserstein & JP Ellison —In a recent JAMA editorial (unfortunately behind a paywall), three authors called for increased use of the Park Responsible Corporate Officer doctrine, under which senior level officials at a company can be held liable under a strict liability theory even if they were not involved in, or even knew about, the alleged violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 11:57 am
Dale Edwin Noyd was born in Wenatchee, Wash., on May 1, 1933. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
  In that case, the United States Supreme Court dealt with the status of twin babies who were born out of wedlock to parents who both were enrolled members of the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians (Tribe) as well as residents and domiciliaries of the Choctaw Reservation.[16]  On January 10, 1986, the twins’ mother deliberately gave birth to the twins in a county some 200 miles from the reservation and executed a consent-to-adoption form in that same… [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am by Schachtman
Juries did just fine on whether Farmer Brown had exercised due care when he ran over his neighbor’s cow with his tractor, or even when a physician opined that a child was born 350 days after the putative father’s death was sired by the testator and entitled to inherit from “dad. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 11:25 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
”  The mere notion of corporate personhood is silly — a corporation exists to make money, and can be born, die, and merge with other corporations at will — but the law in most states treats corporations as if they were people. [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:21 am by ksmcarlson
This is a considerable shift from present practices of the United States. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 7:03 am by Poppy Rimington-Pounder
 The Supreme Court held that the Appeal Court had not applied the correct test from R (Bagdanavicius) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, which for threats from third parties is whether the state has failed to provide reasonable protection against harm inflicted by non-state agents. [read post]