Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 3621 - 3640
of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2007, 9:03 am
" United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 11:14 am
The case will mark the first time in more than a decade that the court agreed to take up a central issue of the gun rights debate, something it has consistently ducked since issuing a landmark ruling in District of Columbia v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 8:09 am
The sentence was vacated and remanded.Congratulations to Mark Werner and Tony Gallagher of the Montana Federal Defenders (Billings) for the win.U.S. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 11:26 am
Schiedmayer Celesta GmbH v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 5:09 am
Which way next for Nokia v Daimler? [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:30 am
The Press explains:On March 8, 1971, the Supreme Court of the United States decided a case, Griggs v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 2:12 am
By Mark A. [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 9:51 pm
The use of other colours and the application of a trade mark other than LEGO are however enough to avoid confusion in this case. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 11:30 pm
Sec. 1071(b) of the Trademark Act, seeking review of the Board's decision in Ballet Tech Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 3:25 pm
His position is revealed in his judgment (another masterly summary of the relevant law, it goes almost without saying) where he states:... [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 7:50 am
Certification marks have been available at a national level in some member states (e.g. the UK, Germany) for a while, but the lack of EU-wide marks has led to inconsistent certification regimes/standards, and geographical gaps in certification. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 9:07 am
R. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 10:26 am
For publication opinions today (2): In Mark Dorman and Tracy Dorman v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 7:09 am
See, e.g., Durr v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 2:08 pm
Brown v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 11:14 am
Brown v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 6:52 pm
The wall of separation between Church and State (Everson v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 7:02 am
” In addition, Tyson states that using statistical averages violated the Rules Enabling Act and the Due Process Clause. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 11:16 am
Wyers v. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s opinion in Michigan v. [read post]
